But couldn’t not taking a side produce or prolong suffering due to inaction? Wouldn’t under that definition disillusioned Luke be correct in no longer fighting? I think these philosophical questions are what the characters should be struggling with, but as the ultimate answer for me it doesn’t track, doesn’t resolve anything and I question how it even forwards the narrative. So much about Star Wars is about choosing trust and love and that being an active thing that even puts you in danger but it’s the right thing to do, balance as neutrality clashes against that for me.
Post #1327956
- Author
- act on instinct
- Parent topic
- The Sequels - George's Original Trilogy
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1327956/action/topic#1327956
- Date created
- 6-Mar-2020, 5:10 PM