logo Sign In

Post #987870

Author
Lord Haseo
Parent topic
Last movie seen
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/987870/action/topic#987870
Date created
25-Aug-2016, 6:25 PM

Dek Rollins said:

Lord Haseo said:

…but I think they did a great job at developing the Bruce/Selina Kyle relationship.

Lol. There was hardly a relationship at all.

Whatever you say man. Just please don’t tell me that Vicky Vale and Bruce’s relationship in Batman 89 is better. I don’t want to hear that shit lol

suspiciouscoffee said:

Vader didn’t love Palpatine. Vader had plans to usurp Palpatine.

Bane loved Miranda/Talia. Bane cried for her. Bane didn’t have any plans for himself, he only cared about her.

The specifics don’t matter when the argument always is that she undermines him simply because she’s his boss. As to what you’re saying what is wrong with a villain having depth. Darth Vader, one of if not the greatest villain in cinematic history was shown to have a lot brimming under the surface so why is it a no-no for Bane to be portrayed in a similar way? Also how does this affect his accolades as a villain?