logo Sign In

Post #981855

Author
pittrek
Parent topic
All Things Star Trek
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/981855/action/topic#981855
Date created
11-Aug-2016, 4:59 AM

Soooooo…

  • a gay character? Sounds OK if they will make it interesting.
  • a female lead? Sounds OK if they make her interesting.
  • thinking about how “diverse” she should be? If I was “non-white” I would probably find it offensive. NO STAR TREK FAN CARES about the skin colour of the main protagonist. We want a good actress playing a well written character! Thinks like gender / race / sexual orientation should NOT be the “defining attributes” of a character
  • 10 years before TOS? I think that’s a horrible idea. That will bring it between The Cage and TOS and way too far from Enterprise. I was secretly hoping for either a post-Enterprise era, maybe even the Romulan War, where Archer would be basically the new show’s Admiral Forrest. Or something post-Nemesis, maybe a USS Titan show under the command of Captain Riker. Or something between TOS and TNG would be great. But they’ve chosen the most boring possibility.
  • making the main lead NOT a captain - I think it’s a very interesting idea and if it’s done correctly it has the potential to be really great.
  • making it serialized instead of episodic - I don’t know what to think yet. The Star Trek format has been always episodic, this is way too different. But I did like the 3rd season of Enterprise, so let’s hope it will be good.
  • forcing me to get Netflix ONLY for this - I hate you for this.