Random Thoughts — Page 452

Jeebus said:

Tyrphanax said:

The most offensive things in this thread is the continued use of “emoji” and the word “titty”.

The English language has developed for thousands of years and the best people can do is revert to pictograms and a third grade word to describe breasts.

Also: Sex as an achievement. Allol.

Me when I see a big ol’ titty

I swear to god I will come down on you like a hammer, Jeebus. Simpsonswave notwithstanding.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Lord Haseo said:

yhwx said:

Lord Haseo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Was there some point in saying “I wish I could fuck Daisy Ridley?” What great discussion was that supposed to spark?

I doubt Duracell was trying to spark a profound conversation with his post; it was just a statement. And I was merely using that as an example of your conduct being that of condescension when someone expressed their sexuality.

Me not being able to find this is really killing me… all I could find is “I would kiss her on the forehead.”

What? lol

I also attempted to look up something like “TV’s Frink why girls don’t come to this forum” and “TV’s Frink girls on the internet” and couldn’t even find that even though he’s said something to that effect multiple times.

Here’s the one I found.

Error not found.

Kind of like searching for mature discussions about sex here.

This one works.

Really disagree with y’all about emoji.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Really disagree with y’all about emoji.

Shocking.

At least I hate the prequels.

yhwx said:

moviefreakedmind said:

TV’s Frink said:

moviefreakedmind said:

TV’s Frink said:

moviefreakedmind said:

DominicCobb said:

TV’s Frink said:

The sex or the talk?

The sex (and I was referring to Haseo and co., though I suppose they’ve never talked sex maturely before either).

I’ve never brought up sex before that I can recall. I also am not aware of it coming up frequently on this site anyway. Usually if it does the only reason conversation persists is because of bitching from the perpetually outraged crowd.

Serious question…have you experienced any difficulty in your life? How about any “ism”?

Yes I’ve experienced plenty of difficulties, including some “ism”.

You seem to find it impossible to see beyond the world as you think it should be.

I don’t find it impossible. To put it bluntly, people being offended by a comic book isn’t my problem. People being offended by media isn’t my problem. People being offended in general isn’t my problem. I don’t even consider those things to be problems. If someone needs help with something then I’ll do what I can, but I’m not shedding any tears over people getting their feelings hurt by media.

Anything that doesn’t affect you isn’t your problem. Got it.

I said that people getting offended by entertainment media isn’t my problem.

What if you were offended by media?

I’d not look at it. I’m offended by plenty but I’m not so entitled as to think that I can get some company to shut down a comic book or alter it because I don’t like it.

DominicCobb said:

Lord Haseo said:

yhwx said:

It has nothing to do with sensitivity. It has to do with not being a dick.

Lord Haseo said:

I should be dying on the inside because manspreading was actually a viable gripe feminazis had not too long ago.

It’s 2016. People get offended by anything these days. Doesn’t mean I should feel woe because they’re susceptible to being butthurt about everything. This doesn’t apply to sexism, racism, homophobia, offensive comments about the handicapped, comments about the recently deceased etc.

I’m talking about the smaller stuff.

Right? All these kids these days getting butthurt because they’re being called immature.

Calling people immature misogynists (especially since from what I can gather from your posts you’re no older than 20) is worth getting pissed about. It’s a slanderous accusation.

Slanderous? I think not.

DuracellEnergizer said:

yhwx said:

Lord Haseo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Was there some point in saying “I wish I could fuck Daisy Ridley?” What great discussion was that supposed to spark?

I doubt Duracell was trying to spark a profound conversation with his post; it was just a statement. And I was merely using that as an example of your conduct being that of condescension when someone expressed their sexuality.

Me not being able to find this is really killing me… all I could find is “I would kiss her on the forehead.”

FWIW, I remember myself saying these three simple words: “I’d do her.” Nothing more nor less than that.

JFTR, though, I soon came to regret those choice of words. What I should have said was this: “I’d have carnal relations with her.” It’s more in keeping with my style, after all.

I found the post!

One giant leap for mankind.

DuracellEnergizer said:

yhwx said:

Slanderous? I think not.

You’re right, it’s not slander.

Slander is spoken. In print it’s libel.

Silly me. Saying somebody hates women is a despicable thing to say. Especially when you’re saying it because they don’t agree that a cartoon is offensive.

We’re criticizing the actions, not the people.

yhwx said:

We’re criticizing the actions, not the people.

Yeah well, seeing as how everything you say is rife with transphobic undertones, I’m not surprised.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Maybe I should have grabbed a woman’s ass. If I’m gonna get criticized for my actions, at least it should be for actions that are actually worthy of criticism.

Please do not do that.

Jeebus said:

yhwx said:

We’re criticizing the actions, not the people.

Which is why it’s useless to call people immature misogynists. It only puts them on the defensive, and they won’t be receptive to anything you (not you specifically, the ‘royal you’) say after that.

Anyone who’s going to call me a misogynist can go fuck themselves.

moviefreakedmind said:

yhwx said:

We’re criticizing the actions, not the people.

Yeah well, seeing as how everything you say is rife with transphobic undertones, I’m not surprised.

Really? I mean, everybody has subconscious biases. I guess I’ve just not seen some of these yet. What makes you think I’m transphobic?

moviefreakedmind said:

Jeebus said:

yhwx said:

We’re criticizing the actions, not the people.

Which is why it’s useless to call people immature misogynists. It only puts them on the defensive, and they won’t be receptive to anything you (not you specifically, the ‘royal you’) say after that.

Anyone who’s going to call me a misogynist can go fuck themselves.

There are very few people who can be called a misogynist or a racist. For most other people, you really have to say that a certain action or viewpoint is misogynistic. Don’t criticize the person in most cases.