Originally posted by: Metallaxis
I assume you are aware that when we are speaking in terms of optical resolution beeing printed on film (even with film of small format, used in everyday cameras), we are talking about "Gigapixels" of resolution. So it makes no sense at all to mention the information lost during optical anamorphic transfer, since a resolution of 720x480 = 0,35Megapixels is concidered enough for the DVD format.
That would be the reason I wouldn't put the arguement, and I suppose you have a similar reason
I assume you are aware that when we are speaking in terms of optical resolution beeing printed on film (even with film of small format, used in everyday cameras), we are talking about "Gigapixels" of resolution. So it makes no sense at all to mention the information lost during optical anamorphic transfer, since a resolution of 720x480 = 0,35Megapixels is concidered enough for the DVD format.
That would be the reason I wouldn't put the arguement, and I suppose you have a similar reason
Sorry...I probably should've put a
in my post to indicate the silliness of it. Plus, I wasn't talking about DVD at all, but rather shooting on film.