logo Sign In

Post #945201

Author
EJones216
Parent topic
Info: The process of actual FILM editing - negatives, interpositives etc.
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/945201/action/topic#945201
Date created
24-May-2016, 6:16 AM

Multiple INs would be a given for such a popular film (and I do recall “The Godfather” OCN becoming so worn that the normally photochemical-only Robert A. Harris didn’t want to risk running it through a gear-based mechanism again), but “Empire” and “Jedi” (and “The Godfather Part II” for that matter) weren’t known for having their negatives in such terrible condition… and later on, the extremely popular “Titanic” only needed new INs made. So I guess a couple more questions:

Is there a rough idea for when the OCN-IP-IN-Print order started? And in the case of an optically blown-up Super 35 film, were the anamorphic internegatives straight from the S35 IP or were two more steps added like OCN-IP-Blowup-Positive-IN-Print?