I suppose. But it’s only offensive because of his history. Taken by itself, if someone else had said it it would be acceptable.
When I first started posting frequently here, I defended something he said that wasn’t offensive at all, because Frink couldn’t let a joke go without insulting him. I didn’t know about his post history, so I didn’t have anything against him to make my opinion of his posts biased in a negative reaction.
So I have to say that you are correct in that the only reason some of his posts are hated on so much is because of the rest of his crappy posts, and not because all his posts are actually bad. I still don’t agree with Frink’s notion that everything he says has to hated on just because it’s him.
EDIT:
Not saying the guy isn’t awful though.
Same.