Wait, what? Tell me you didn’t use v2.0 for that shot! Otherwise I can’t imagine why tat R2 unit isn’t blurry, when that was a side-effect of the effects used in the shot, so he’s blurry very much intentionally from v2.1 onward.
Plus, of course, v2.0 uses the GOUT, whereas v2.1 (and 2.5) use 35mm scan.
Well. That was an accident. When i fixed the dewback shot I think I looked at the end of the shot and the two R2 units and assumed the clearer shot was 2.5.
Fixed it after reading DL’s post about it. Can give the fixed version to anyone interested. Otherwise, when I get the lossless 2.5 discs from marvins and encode the higher quality version it’ll be fixed.