logo Sign In

Post #911771

Author
TV's Frink
Parent topic
Team Negative1
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/911771/action/topic#911771
Date created
24-Feb-2016, 5:05 PM

Stinky-Dinkins said:

LeeThorogood said:

mverta said:

As I said specifically, I don’t care that Joe shared his prints. It’s was Pete’s, which he was explicitly told not to, that’s wrong. As for -1 knowing? I have no idea. As for the “fuck you,” that for being ungrateful and shitty, even after I helped them out. As for their edition looking amateur and pretty shitty, it does. So what?

_Mike

In case you missed this while you were posting Stinky-Dinkins ^

Yeah I saw it, but it really doesn’t answer any of it.

Why is Mike so furious with -1? The only possible reason is that Mike knows that -1 was told that Joe was absolutely not to disseminate a copy of Pete’s scans, but he accepted and worked with them none the less. How does Mike know that -1 was informed of this fact? How did -1 even know Joe had anything to begin with, let alone the fact that Joe had Pete’s scans? So Joe sent him Pete’s scans (that he wasn’t supposed to) but not his own scans (which Mike would’ve had no problem with)? Why was Pete’s reaction to the discovery that -1 received copies of his scans so visceral, specifically knowing who -1 was and hating him prior to this entire thing?

Yeah, I’m still confused as well. Again, if the ban was for this specific issue, but Mike doesn’t know if -1 knew the situation or not, it doesn’t seem like -1 can definitively be blamed.

But again, with that said, the team account should stay banned for unrelated issues, which is an opinion of mine but one that Jay seems to agree with based on this post.

Jay said:

My mistake was allowing TN1 to maintain a team account in the first place. I allowed their contributions to the community to influence my decision. I apologize to the community for my lapse in judgment.

Anyone directly involved with the situation is free to post, but in the interest of transparency, we’re going to do it as ourselves and not hide behind a group account.

So really the only issue is if -1 is being treated unfairly, and since he’s free to come here and tell his side of the story, I think the answer is no.