Hello, everyone -
I have made a video for you, so that you may have all the facts and straight from the horse’s mouth. That goes for you, too, Rob, because you keep geting stuck in the middle and it’s painful to watch. Go and view the video, and let us talk about this no more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkiqQq6KfDY
Additionally, I will be on my usual Ustream live-stream channel for a couple hours or so if you’d like to ask any questions or whatever, at ustream.tv/channel/mike-verta
Thanks everyone!
_Mike
Nutshell: “Joe” funded the scanning of his own print, in contribution to the Legacy project, and received a copy. No agreement was reached as to what he could do or not do with this copy. Later, “Joe” also funded the scanning of “Pete’s” print and was sent a copy of that as well, under the agreement that he not distribute that particular copy under any circumstance. At this point Joe has contributed several tens of thousands of dollars to the project. He then sent -1 a copy of the scans of Pete’s prints, despite agreeing not to do so. These particular scans [and not the scans of Joe’s print] were then used by -1 once work began on their Technicolor project.
So, was -1 aware that Joe had previously agreed not to disseminate Pete’s print under any circumstance? Do you have any problem with -1 using a copy of Joe’s print?