Yes, they did, but they appear to have the blessing of the person that paid for, and owned the scan. Apparently, TN1 wrongly assumed “person 3” wouldn’t have a problem with this. It’s fair to say, they should have explicitly asked permission from “person 3” to be sure. Both TN1 and “person 2” have been labeled as untrustworthy or worse. However, I don’t see much evidence of malicious intent or unethical behaviour, at least not to the extend that was presented to us. What does appear to be the case, is that when MikeV and/or “person 3” found out TN1 were using the scan in question, rather than asking TN1 to stop their activity, and remove any references to it, they contacted OT.com with their complaint, and TN1 was banned without due process.