My point was, you were treated better than TN1, even though you broke the same rules. And you had to be asked to stop, you didn’t just stop because there was a rule against it.
I don’t know what you are talking about, perhaps you can provide some links to back your version of these events up (not that anyone but you or I cares). N1 and I were both asked to stop, we both did, and then he started up again. I was absolutely not treated better than N1, we were both treated the same. We were both told to stop, we were both notified of the three warnings, I stopped. He got one warning, then he left.
I don’t have any quarrel with you but it is no secret that you are given quite a bit of latitude here where others are not so I guess what I’m saying is you don’t have a lot of room to support their banning if you don’t support your own for equal behavior.
My position was that there never should have been a team account in the first place. My opinion was that it just allowed for more confusion while doing nothing for anonymity, and I think the events of late have borne my opinion out.
I supported this ban specifically because, as I said (and you seem to be ignoring), everyone was in agreement (including a member of the team) that a line had been crossed. Now that member has changed his mind, and frankly I don’t know what to think now, but take it up with Jay if you think I have no right to my opinion.
Again, I’m glad we get along and I’m not trying to start anything, this is my opinion on the contradiction.
You are welcome to your opinion, but I believe you are misremembering what happened, and further, the situation has changed again so of course my position is subject to changing along with it.
Regardless, I’m sure no one else cares about this. It has nothing to do with the situation at hand.