logo Sign In

Post #904574

Author
John Doom
Parent topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/904574/action/topic#904574
Date created
5-Feb-2016, 4:21 AM

adywan said:

Strange thing is, Snoke looked pretty good for the most part when i saw it in 2D. The 3D really didn’t help him. The close up shots looked the best. Others have been pixel f**ked too much with atmospherics and such. I thought Maz looked amazing though. The movement and especially the clothing rendering was perfect. Even better in 2D.

I can’t believe you’re actually saying these two characters looked fine on screen (I saw it in 2D too) : had they used good CGI, nobody in this forum would’ve even noticed it, instead here we are still talking about their CGI 😄

They did try to do Maz as a practical effect, but it wasn’t possible.

With little effort and greater results, I think they could’ve done Maz as a practical effect like they did with Yogurt:

P.S.: Dek Rollins, your avatar is pretty old-school, I like it 😉