- Time
- Post link
I don’t think Bosk is a troll. My money is on him being just an obnoxious dim-wit with no friends and no skills.
I’m trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.
真実
What didn't you like about TFA? SPOILERS — Page 33
- Time
- Post link
Even more ridiculous than two seater tie fighters to serve narrative
And this is why Frink thinks you’re trolling.
Don’t speak for me, he’s trolled much harder than that.
Yes and you’ve tried your hardest to ‘cyberbully’ virtually every post made by any new users/users regarding their dislike of TFA or anything else for that matter you could mock be it a typo or anything else trivial, which epitomises what an actual troll is!
Run-on sentence…
C-
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I don’t think Bosk is a troll. My money is on him being just an obnoxious dim-wit with no friends and no skills.
My money is that you have absolutely no Penis.
Bosk, You were warned about personal attacks. Take a break.
Wexter, consider this a warning for the same thing.
- Time
- Post link
I don’t think Bosk is a troll. My money is on him being just an obnoxious dim-wit with no friends and no skills.
I’m trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I don’t require anything from someone like you!
- Time
- Post link
Even more ridiculous than two seater tie fighters to serve narrative
And this is why Frink thinks you’re trolling.
Don’t speak for me, he’s trolled much harder than that.
Yes and you’ve tried your hardest to ‘cyberbully’ virtually every post made by any new users/users regarding their dislike of TFA or anything else for that matter you could mock be it a typo or anything else trivial, which epitomises what an actual troll is!
Run-on sentence…
C-
I rest my case
- Time
- Post link
I don’t think Bosk is a troll. My money is on him being just an obnoxious dim-wit with no friends and no skills.
My money is that you have absolutely no Penis.
Ouch! Looks like my assessment was spot-on. Now go play with your own and try not to hurt yourself 😉
- Time
- Post link
Even more ridiculous than two seater tie fighters to serve narrative
And this is why Frink thinks you’re trolling.
Don’t speak for me, he’s trolled much harder than that.
Yes and you’ve tried your hardest to ‘cyberbully’ virtually every post made by any new users/users regarding their dislike of TFA or anything else for that matter you could mock be it a typo or anything else trivial, which epitomises what an actual troll is!
Run-on sentence…
C-
I rest my case
THATS THE JOKE
- Time
- Post link
I don’t think Bosk is a troll. My money is on him being just an obnoxious dim-wit with no friends and no skills.
My money is that you have absolutely no Penis.
Ouch! Looks like my assessment was spot-on. Now go play with your own and try not to hurt yourself 😉
You two should probably mind the rules…
- Time
- Post link
Noted. Sorry for the disturbance. 😃
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
If you ignore trolls, they go away.
In this day and age it’s impossible to distinguish a troll from someone with a really obscure opinion. 5+ years ago it wasn’t this hard but there’s been an awakening. A shift in perspective that was caused when facts and opinions started becoming blurred and solid reasoning was abandoned in favor of equality. And now we have come to this point…
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
If you ignore trolls, they go away.
In this day and age it’s impossible to distinguish a troll from someone with a really obscure opinion. 5+ years ago it wasn’t this hard but there’s been an awakening. A shift in perspective that was caused when facts and opinions started becoming blurred and solid reasoning was abandoned in favor of equality. And now we have come to this point…
If what you are saying wasn’t stupid and was actually true, I would say the change was that people started to use their own heads.
What facts? When it comes to film impression, there are just opinions. I guess your perception of facts and opinions is blurred.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
If you ignore trolls, they go away.
In this day and age it’s impossible to distinguish a troll from someone with a really obscure opinion. 5+ years ago it wasn’t this hard but there’s been an awakening. A shift in perspective that was caused when facts and opinions started becoming blurred and solid reasoning was abandoned in favor of equality. And now we have come to this point…
If what you are saying wasn’t stupid and was actually true, I would say the change was that people started to use their own heads.
What facts? When it comes to film impression, there are just opinions. I guess your perception of facts and opinions is blurred.
Trolls usually spew half truths, popular misconceptions and sometimes blatant lies in order to keep the conversation going. A few years ago it was easy to spot a troll but now adays there are times when you’re arguing with someone who has an obscure opinion they sometimes resort to the using similar if not the same rationales for why the like or dislike something. So when someone says something like “salacious crumb was the best thing about the Saga” you don’t know if they’re serious or not.
I hope I adequately explained this.
EDIT:
Also to be fair popular misconceptions are a HUGE reason it’s hard to tell a troll from a person with a vastly different perspective.
- Time
- Post link
New information has come in regarding the lightsaber on Cloud City.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
^That never should have been left on the cutting room floor.
- Time
- Post link
As someone who enjoyed the movie overall, if I could have seen it ahead of time and made any one small change, I’d remove the joke about Finn not understanding Han’s nod to look behind him. That’s one thing I felt was a little too dumb.
I know I’ve made some very poor decisions recently.
- Time
- Post link
I’m not going to bother reading this thread for a few weeks. It’s just too silly.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I’d remove the joke about Finn not understanding Han’s nod to look behind him. That’s one thing I felt was a little too dumb.
I think they just made it last too long. I got the joke the millisecond they started it, and thought it was well done. But then, inexplicably, it seemed to drag on interminably. Like, how many head nods do you guys need here to complete this scene? It isn’t a gag that needs an extended pantomime sequence to play out, they could have done it in the time it took Boyega to speak his line. It’s funny how a few milliseconds can be the difference between nailing the joke and trashing it.
Or rather… NOT funny, if you know what I mean.
badump bump
- Time
- Post link
At the end of the day, can we all just agree that we all have opinions? There is no one opinion that is fact. If you enjoyed it, great! If you hated it, that’s fine too. I see it from both sides, as the movie has positives, but also some pretty low lows. I know this movie is going to divide the fanbase again, as the dislikers are pretty passionate, as well as the fanboys. We all have our faults, but the best thing to do is to not criticize the person, or the critiques. As HelloGreedo himself said, “People love what they love. There’s nothing wrong with that. To each his own.”
~The original trilogy is my life… kind of~
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
or the critiques
No, some critiques are more valid than others. Someone thinking that TFA is too similar to ANH is a somewhat valid complaint while TIE Fighters have two seats is not. Even though I don’t completely agree with the former critique I do realize that that can impact someone’s view on the film.
- Time
- Post link
Lord Haseo said:
Someone thinking that TFA is too similar to ANH is a valid complaint while TIE Fighters have two seats is not.
As opposed to former, the later is actually technically valid complaint. As an expert, I can easily say that having a “gunner” with a rotatable cannon on a fighter is stupid. It is nothing but a waste for a fighter role ship.
真実
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
As with many complaints about TFA, I think it’s valid as long as you hold the OT to the same standard. The snowspeeders on Hoth are equally stupid from that standpoint. With that said, neither bothers me.
- Time
- Post link
Someone thinking that TFA is too similar to ANH is a somewhat valid complaint
I think it’s completely valid. But it doesn’t mean I feel the same.
- Time
- Post link
Lord Haseo said:
Someone thinking that TFA is too similar to ANH is a valid complaint while TIE Fighters have two seats is not.As opposed to former, the later is actually technically valid complaint. As an expert, I can easily say that having a “gunner” with a rotatable cannon on a fighter is stupid. It is nothing but a waste for a fighter role ship.
I don’t see how having more options as it pertains to offence is a bad thing. Saves the pilot from having to concentrate on flying and blowing stuff up at the same time.
- Time
- Post link
Lord Haseo said:
Someone thinking that TFA is too similar to ANH is a valid complaint while TIE Fighters have two seats is not.As opposed to former, the later is actually technically valid complaint. As an expert, I can easily say…
Enough of this already! Star Wars never gave a damn about technical specifics. We could easily rip the OT to shreds based on the questionably designed or downright flawed machinery and locations. But we don’t because that would be stupid, right?
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
How many feelings would I hurt here if I said the Falcon would never make it out of an Earthlike atmosphere? Or that TIEs probably wouldn’t hold up to the torque generated by their tight flying patterns? Or that the Death Star would be impossible to construct and power?
Let’s throw technical criticisms like these out the window. Star Wars has only ever been medieval fantasy with a sci fi veneer. Save those critiques for Star Trek, which actually strives to be relatively hard sci fi.