Originally posted by: Dr_Gonzo
More likely a framerate issue.
Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
Maybe he tried to put an anamorphic and non-anamorphic picture together? Just a thought. It's early.
Maybe he tried to put an anamorphic and non-anamorphic picture together? Just a thought. It's early.

More likely a framerate issue.
I am with Dr_Gonzo on this, the 2004 SE is possibely at 29.97 fps interlaced NTSC and DR_Gonzo's is at 25 fps progressive NTSC...... am I right?