logo Sign In

The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS ** — Page 60

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Alderaan said:

hydrospanner said:

Alderaan said:

Also look at the execution of the plot on screen. Do you really want to compare the original Death Star attack with Starkiller assault side-by-side? Same plot elements can get boring AND pale in quality to the original.

I did compare it. The Starkiller assault was way better than the Death Star attack in the original. Everyone who likes TFA has even stated as much in their review.

All the lolz

I thought that was satire but honestly I’m not sure.

Satire? Come on, Poe flying through that crevice and blowing up the oscillator with his top gun skills was way cooler than when Luke flew down a trench and had to use the force to luckily make the shot because he just wasn’t a very good pilot. Hasn’t everyone that who claims to enjoy TFA agreed on this? In fact all TFA has done is make me realize how awful the original Star Wars was and just how much better it could have been. Now that I have seen a better remake of it I’ll probably just throw my copy of the original in the trash.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

imperialscum said:
There is no real lead. Finn has just as much weight I would say. It is a similar mess as TPM.

This is absolutely and unequivocally true. So does Han Solo.

Author
Time

I thought it was pretty obvious that Rey is the protogontist.

Author
Time

Rey is definitely the lead, in the way Luke was. Finn is more like Leia in being a potential love interest and if the Poe Dameron fan theories come to anything it’s a potential triangle with Finn as the critical vertex.

Author
Time

hydrospanner said:

TV’s Frink said:

Alderaan said:

hydrospanner said:

Alderaan said:

Also look at the execution of the plot on screen. Do you really want to compare the original Death Star attack with Starkiller assault side-by-side? Same plot elements can get boring AND pale in quality to the original.

I did compare it. The Starkiller assault was way better than the Death Star attack in the original. Everyone who likes TFA has even stated as much in their review.

All the lolz

I thought that was satire but honestly I’m not sure.

Satire? Come on, Poe flying through that crevice and blowing up the oscillator with his top gun skills was way cooler than when Luke flew down a trench and had to use the force to luckily make the shot because he just wasn’t a very good pilot. Hasn’t everyone that who claims to enjoy TFA agreed on this? In fact all TFA has done is make me realize how awful the original Star Wars was and just how much better it could have been. Now that I have seen a better remake of it I’ll probably just throw my copy of the original in the trash.

My bad. I’ll do the same.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bingowings said:

Rey is definitely the lead, in the way Luke was. Finn is more like Leia in being a potential love interest and if the Poe Dameron fan theories come to anything it’s a potential triangle with Finn as the critical vertex.

I think Rey and Poe will fight over Finn.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Bingowings said:

Rey is definitely the lead, in the way Luke was. Finn is more like Leia in being a potential love interest and if the Poe Dameron fan theories come to anything it’s a potential triangle with Finn as the critical vertex.

I think Rey and Poe will fight over Finn.

I personally think that would be cool, that would just leave Trek in the closet 😃

Author
Time

Doesn’t China have some kind of law against movies with positive portrayals of homosexuality? Unless Disney is willing to forgo Chinese box office completely, I think the Finn/Poe tension is going to remain subtext in future installments.

Author
Time

Yoda Is Your Father said:

Post Praetorian said:

Yoda Is Your Father said:

I honestly can’t believe that anybody claiming to be a Star Wars fan could genuinely think that AOTC or any of the prequels is better than TFA.

I am not doing so out of a sheer sense of misplaced humor if that is what you might be suspecting…my frustration is genuine…and the realization that it has brought to mind is equally so.

You are actually serious. You actually prefer the prequels to TFA. Lunacy.

Post Praetorian said:

Yoda Is Your Father said:

I would rather watch the Rathtar scene from TFA on repeat for two hours than have to sit through one viewing of the droid factory scene where CGI threepio get his head stuck on a battle droid.

I would rather watch a film with more space/droid battles than one in which yet another Death Star is blown up with even less rationale than the prior two efforts…

You’re nuts mate. It doesn’t matter how ‘original’ the prequels are. They were long-winded, boring cartoons filled with bad dialogue, convoluted plots, and terrible, all-style-no-substance set pieces. In addition to being bad in their own right, they also damaged the original trilogy by ret-conning key characters and moments.

I compare the initial feeling I had after watching the PT to how I felt after TFA…what I recall is being interested in how the story-line unfolded in the PT, while during TFA I was struggling not to out-predict each development given its seeming lack of originality. The difference was striking. Given a choice between a ‘convoluted’ and original plot as opposed to an unoriginal re-hash I prefer the former…if your preference is towards the latter so be it.

A semen and dog shit sandwich for lunch is ‘original’, but I’ll take good ol’ ham and cheese any day of the week.

Is this excessively insulting tone fully necessary…? Is this truly an attempt to bully or shame me out of my honest opinion…?

Judging from some of the posts I’ve seen, there are a lot of guys here who either study film, work in film, or teach film - genuine, educated fans of the medium we call cinema. No true lover of cinema can honestly believe (or successfully argue) that the prequels are good movies. They just can’t. they can try, but they’re wrong. This is not a matter of opinion, it’s a matter of fact.

I was unaware that there is such thing as subjective fact… Seemingly the attempt to align ‘genuine[ly] educated fans’ with your opinion is little more than words on a page. It is surprising that it is up to me to inform you that others are perfectly free to enjoy what-so-ever they prefer for whatever reasons they may dream up, just as are you. These odd tactics of defiling the ‘unbeliever’ border upon religious-fervor…it is absolutely bizarre behavior. I apologize if I may have struck too close to the core of a cherished belief… It was not my intent to seek to damage some valuable sense of self that may feel threatened in the face of a contrary point of view…

All I can assume is there are some people here who either a) like to show off their ‘superior’ knowledge of film theory by championing a contrary view or b) just like to argue.

c) Hold a different opinion than do you…

Regards,

Post Praetorian

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

a_moldey_waffle said:

There are too many moments like when Han runs into the frame for the first time and stands there, waiting for the audience to finish cheering before saying his first line. It’s also off putting the way these moments were structured in that they were paced out in small doses as the film progressed.

It’s like the filmmakers are going: Ok everybody it’s now time to clap for the falcon - 20 min later - Ok folks here comes Han, time for another applause - 20 more min - Now here’s Lei and C-3P0, more applause please.
This 4th walled exhibitionism of OT imagery and characters distracts from the core narrative, which is something a film should never do. You enjoyed those moments in the theater but I can bet you’ll be cringing when you watch the BD by yourself.

Exactly how I felt. I called it flatness in my review, but you put words to this a thousand times better than how I did. It’s a movie that has all the elements there, but it presents them in a way that you think to yourself: “Wow, they made Han appear through that door” instead of “Han appeared through that door”. The implicit but unquestionable presence of “they” is what makes me unable to enjoy the movie.

Yes, to me, it’s exactly how you said. It’s putting the fourth wall in constant jeopardy.

The major members of the new “generation” of Star Wars characters–Rey, Finn, and Kylo Ren–all stood in the shadow of a past in different ways. Or said differently, each is a sort of “fan” of the same Star Wars stories that we know and love, and they all find themselves struggling with the canon.

Rey’s fandom is on full display in the form of a vintage X-Wing helmet and a doll of a rebel pilot–probably Luke, whose sandy footsteps Rey seems to be following in (…) Kylo Ren dwells on the good ol’ days of Darth Vader, frustrated like a 20-something who thinks that Baby Boomers are right about the rest of his lazy generation.

I’ve said this about Kylo even before the release of the movie. I didn’t notice to what extend Rey was depicted the same way as well. All the characters are fans. This stresses even more the jeopardy of the fourth wall. What’s iconic for us from our childhood is iconic for them as history. It gets you out of the movie.

While some users may see some of this as a “cynic exercise”…

a_moldey_waffle said:

the term ‘fan film’ really does come to mind when thinking about The Force Awakens (Much like J.J.'s Star Trek and Into Darkness).

Pew Pew, how cool, awesome, epic, cool, it’s gonna be epic, its goona be kuuuhl!

PS: And I’m the one who is all for including “legend” Anakin Skywalker and “legend” OWK references in Rebel Alliance scenes in OT radical fan-edits. But the whole point of the OT was that three no-ones can bring down a whole Empire with the only force of conviction and a few proton torpedoes.

Author
Time

joefavs said:

Doesn’t China have some kind of law against movies with positive portrayals of homosexuality? Unless Disney is willing to forgo Chinese box office completely, I think the Finn/Poe tension is going to remain subtext in future installments.

Not being an expert I looked it up on not entirely expert Wikipedia and there have been a large number of films made on the subject in China (mostly Hong Kong but not banned).

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Ah, all right. That’s kind of funny, I saw a huge article last week about how Disney ought to be bold in the face of this Chinese policy that evidently doesn’t exist.

Author
Time

a_moldey_waffle said:

Forgive me If I am repeating anything anyone else has said, I have not read through this entire thread. Just want to give some of my thoughts.

I think the notion that TFA is a well acted, directed, designed, and composed film (on a technical level) can not be disputed. The film follows Campbell’s pattern of the hero’s journey almost religiously (much like the original Star Wars) and through this finds much success. That combined with truly solid directing and staging makes for a film that certainly kept me invested from beginning to end. The lazy staging of the prequels (walking and talking, sitting on a couch in shot reverse shot telling the plot rather than showing it) is done away with in TFA. There is always action and the characters are always doing rather than saying. The story and action keeps moving forward. This is what makes a movie a movie, rather than a play. This is something George did not understand when making the prequels while J.J. on the other hand knows how to turn a narrative into compelling cinema. On that front, The Force Awakens is overall a well-executed film. “Faster and more intense” was certainly taken to heart.

Having said that, the biggest issue I have with The Force Awakens is that it is too reliant on exhibitionism and audience interaction. It is content to rest on the laurels of the franchise and let the already iconic imagery do the work without offering anything new to the table. There are too many moments like when Han runs into the frame for the first time and stands there, waiting for the audience to finish cheering before saying his first line. It’s also off putting the way these moments were structured in that they were paced out in small doses as the film progressed. It’s like the filmmakers are going: Ok everybody it’s now time to clap for the falcon - 20 min later - Ok folks here comes Han, time for another applause - 20 more min - Now here’s Lei and C-3P0, more applause please. This 4th walled exhibitionism of OT imagery and characters distracts from the core narrative, which is something a film should never do. You enjoyed those moments in the theater but I can bet you’ll be cringing when you watch the BD by yourself or with just a small number of people. Now, of course OT imagery is necessary in this film as it is a continuation of the story. My issue is not with the imagery itself but they way it is presented, pausing for applause and then moving on. The more subtle things such as the red screen on the Falcon turret was something I appreciated a whole lot more because it adheres to established visual continuity (which makes you feel like we are right back where we left off) without being in your face about it, unlike a lot of other moments.

Where the prequels failed as compelling cinema, they succeeded in contributing to the lore. Despite their poor execution as films (really poor execution) they, at the very least, are wholly original in both background narrative and mise en scene (in other words, iconic imagery such as coruscant, battle droids, etc.) TFA fails on this account.

I know this has been said before and many will be quick to jump on me because of it, but the term ‘fan film’ really does come to mind when thinking about The Force Awakens (Much like J.J.'s Star Trek and Into Darkness). The Force Awakens is, at the end of the day, a caricature of the the original films without any of the substance. There was true mysticism, spirituality, and meaning behind the original three films. There is real wisdom to be drawn from Yoda’s teachings for example. There is no such substance in The Force Awakens. In being so overtly celebratory of the original trilogy with the wink winks and 4th walled references, TFA ironically fails to understand and capture the real reason we love Star Wars; that is the emotional connection to the characters. Rey has no time to realistically develop as a character because she is too busy saying stuff like “You’re Han Solo! You made the Kessel run in 12 parsecs”. It’s very difficult to get pulled into a story when the film tries so hard to pull you back out with lines like that.

Sorry for making this so long, It was not what I intended when I started typing. I can’t help but ramble sometimes. There’s more stuff I wanted to touch on (which I did not like) such as marvel humor, the poor score, and more. Perhaps another time. Thanks for reading.

TLDR: The Force Awakens is a great action film worth seeing (as if anyone hasn’t seen it ;D). It was meticulously designed to do nothing more than please the general audience and it succeeds in achieving that goal. However it is too bogged down by reliance on exhibitionism and audience interaction and as such loses the emotional connection to the audience.

A good assessment…

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

a_moldey_waffle said:

Having said that, the biggest issue I have with The Force Awakens is that it is too reliant on exhibitionism and audience interaction. It is content to rest on the laurels of the franchise and let the already iconic imagery do the work without offering anything new to the table.

I’m going to disagree here. There is so much new, and so much risk taking, that I can’t agree nothing new is brought to the table.

Female lead to carry the movie, who is allowed to stay covered up (in one outfit, no less) and get sweaty and dirty? Huge risk.

Black second lead, as a defecting stormtrooper? Risk.

Han gets killed? Giant risk.

Luke doesn’t show up until the last scene and doesn’t say anything? Risk!

We get a complex imperfect villain completely unlike Vader who idolizes him at the same time. Not to mention a villain who doesn’t look like one when he takes the mask off. We see the force used in new and interesting ways.

I don’t disagree with much of your points, and the movie does play it safe in some ways, but it’s not a safe movie.

These are fair points as well…

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Bingowings said:

Rey is definitely the lead, in the way Luke was. Finn is more like Leia in being a potential love interest and if the Poe Dameron fan theories come to anything it’s a potential triangle with Finn as the critical vertex.

I think Rey and Poe will fight over Finn.

I wouldn’t mind this…too bad Finn is forever encumbered by the shackles of the friendzone

Author
Time

It makes perfect sense that our new characters would be in awe of the old characters, within the world that was set up in the movie…the old characters weren’t thought to be real, but rather myths and legends.

Author
Time

Lord Haseo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Bingowings said:

Rey is definitely the lead, in the way Luke was. Finn is more like Leia in being a potential love interest and if the Poe Dameron fan theories come to anything it’s a potential triangle with Finn as the critical vertex.

I think Rey and Poe will fight over Finn.

I wouldn’t mind this…too bad Finn is forever encumbered by the shackles of the friendzone

Or so we are led to believe.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

It makes perfect sense that our new characters would be in awe of the old characters, within the world that was set up in the movie…the old characters weren’t thought to be real, but rather myths and legends.

I agree…I found this somewhat cute…yet at the same time I can see how for some it might distract…

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It’s hard to square you being reasonable with your preference for the prequels. :p

Author
Time

hmm not much in the movie to like. one of the dumbest was line “thats the republic”, soo the republic consists of about ten planets? wouldn’t the empire of just conquered them by now if thats the case? i can just see some trekie vs debate bringing that up.(gag) on the funnier side, those green crackers—SOYLENT GREEN IS MADE FROM GUNGUNS!

Author
Time

Mithrandir said:

a_moldey_waffle said:

There are too many moments like when Han runs into the frame for the first time and stands there, waiting for the audience to finish cheering before saying his first line. It’s also off putting the way these moments were structured in that they were paced out in small doses as the film progressed.

It’s like the filmmakers are going: Ok everybody it’s now time to clap for the falcon - 20 min later - Ok folks here comes Han, time for another applause - 20 more min - Now here’s Lei and C-3P0, more applause please.
This 4th walled exhibitionism of OT imagery and characters distracts from the core narrative, which is something a film should never do. You enjoyed those moments in the theater but I can bet you’ll be cringing when you watch the BD by yourself.

Exactly how I felt. I called it flatness in my review, but you put words to this a thousand times better than how I did. It’s a movie that has all the elements there, but it presents them in a way that you think to yourself: “Wow, they did Han appear through that door” instead of “Han appear throught that door”. The implicit but unquestionable presence of “they” is what makes me unable to enjoy the movie.

Yes, to me, it’s exactly how you said. It’s putting the fourth wall in constant jeopardy.

The major members of the new “generation” of Star Wars characters–Rey, Finn, and Kylo Ren–all stood in the shadow of a past in different ways. Or said differently, each is a sort of “fan” of the same Star Wars stories that we know and love, and they all find themselves struggling with the canon.

Rey’s fandom is on full display in the form of a vintage X-Wing helmet and a doll of a rebel pilot–probably Luke, whose sandy footsteps Rey seems to be following in (…) Kylo Ren dwells on the good ol’ days of Darth Vader, frustrated like a 20-something who thinks that Baby Boomers are right about the rest of his lazy generation.

I’ve said this about Kylo even before the release of the movie. I didn’t notice to what extend Rey was depicted the same way as well. All the characters are fans. This stresses even more the jeopardy of the fourth wall. What’s iconic for us from our childhood is iconic for them as history. It gets you out of the movie.

While some users may see some of this as a “cynic exercise”…

a_moldey_waffle said:

the term ‘fan film’ really does come to mind when thinking about The Force Awakens (Much like J.J.'s Star Trek and Into Darkness).

Pew Pew, how cool, awesome, epic, cool, it’s gonna be epic, its goona be kuuuhl!

PS: And I’m the one who is all for including “legend” Anakin Skywalker and “legend” OWK references in Rebel Alliance scenes in OT radical fan-edits. But the whole point of the OT was that three no-ones can bring down a whole Empire with the only force of conviction and a few proton torpedoes.

Because ESB and ROTJ don’t have those grand entrance moments either.

Even Mel Brooks edits his films to give the audience time to react to stuff.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

timemeddler said:

hmm not much in the movie to like. one of the dumbest was line “thats the republic”, soo the republic consists of about ten planets?

I don’t remember who said this and what exactly they said, can you elaborate?

Author
Time

dont remember who said it, it was just after that death star on steroids blew up a couple of planets.