I saw the film again and enjoyed it more. I think there were a number of reasons.

Firstly, I saw it in IMAX 3D rather than ‘Real’ 3D, which was a far less intrusive format. The standard 3D really detracted from the cinema experience – it was too fake and too dark. I really advise anyone who hasn’t seen it yet to view it in IMAX or 2D.

Secondly, my viewing experience no longer had the burden of expectation. I could just enjoy it as a spectacle. I think it works as a ‘big dumb Hollywood movie’ – though it’s certainly better than say ‘Jurassic World’. It isn’t on a par with the original trilogy. But it’s definitely better than the Prequels, which I loathe. (I never thought it was that bad but was disappointed.)

That said, it doesn’t mean I take back any of my criticism of the film. It does hark back to ANH too much, it is too fast paced – I didn’t change my mind about that. But it is an enjoyable ride.

The main criticisms of the friend I went with, who is more of a casual fan, were: Starkiller Base being too much like another Death Star; not enough information about the state of the galaxy; and Daisy Ridley’s acting, which she thought was wooden at the beginning but got better later. She still enjoyed it though (and also thought it far superior to the Prequels).

I think for the average moviegoer and casual fans the criticisms we’ve discussed are an issue but they’re not a major issue and seem unlikely to impact on the film’s box office success.