logo Sign In

Harmy's RETURN OF THE JEDI Despecialized Edition HD - V3.1 — Page 65

Author
Time

Nearsighted Scrappile said:

Hey Harmy,

I’m sure you’re already aware of this, but there is a closeup of Luke on the Tatooine Skiff that looks worse than a TeleSync. It only lasts a few seconds, but man does it shock the eyes!

No idea what you’re talking about - there is only one such shot of Luke at 0:30:34 that’s been replaced with a 35mm source, because a big chunk of it was missing in the SE but it looks awesome - you can tell it’s a bit less detailed than the other shots, if you’re really looking for it but to me it seems to fit in perfectly, so you can’t be talking about that one.

Harmy: Have you gotten a better source for the “At last we have the mighty Chewbacca” shot, that you originally did some neat smoke effects for to mask the GOUT? I know you dropped 1.0 shots in for most of the subtitles in the workprint. So, not sure if it will be upgraded.

Of course I have - I mean, have you seen the workprint?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Harmy said:

Nearsighted Scrappile said:

Hey Harmy,

I’m sure you’re already aware of this, but there is a closeup of Luke on the Tatooine Skiff that looks worse than a TeleSync. It only lasts a few seconds, but man does it shock the eyes!

No idea what you’re talking about - there is only one such shot of Luke at 0:30:34 that’s been replaced with a 35mm source, because a big chunk of it was missing in the SE but it looks awesome - you can tell it’s a bit less detailed than the other shots, if you’re really looking for it but to me it seems to fit in perfectly, so you can’t be talking about that one.

Harmy: Have you gotten a better source for the “At last we have the mighty Chewbacca” shot, that you originally did some neat smoke effects for to mask the GOUT? I know you dropped 1.0 shots in for most of the subtitles in the workprint. So, not sure if it will be upgraded.

Of course I have - I mean, have you seen the workprint?

I thought it looked a bit fuzzy, but didn’t compare it to 1.0 and thought you were using 1.0 for all shots with subtitles. Presumably, comparing them would be night and day? I guess I didn’t appreciate the fact that it really was a smokey shot even in its original state.

Author
Time

Yes, it was at 30:34 that I was talking about. When I went back to the scene and played it a second time, it definitely did not appear nearly as jarring and fit in nicely. Again, I can only thank my crappy eye condition for needing a second viewing. Sorry for any trouble that may have popped up.

It’s really sad when the “creative minds” behind something we hold dear are also guilty of its destruction.

Author
Time

No time for facepalming if you’re going to get us Approaching Storm V5 before the red carpet premiere, Hal!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Probably a stupid question and I apologize in advance for asking, but how do you add that subtitle file to the .mkv to get the missing subtitles?

Author
Time

BMadden said:

Probably a stupid question and I apologize in advance for asking, but how do you add that subtitle file to the .mkv to get the missing subtitles?

Use mkvmerge.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I’m not sure if this works with the SUP subtitles, but for the SRT, just rename them to the same name as your video file but with .srt instead of .mkv and put them in the same folder - this way it will work on most devices - like both my BD players and my TV can show subtitles that are muxed in but my parent’s BD player and TV can only show subtitles if they are added the way I described above.

Also, someone put the workprint on myspleen, which I’m completely fine with, though it would have been better to check with me first.

Author
Time

Also, FWIW, MPC-HC allows you to add an external subtitle file to whatever video file you’re playing (File/Load Subtitle), and it works with the SUP format too.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

Thanks for the help, guys. I used mkvmerge to add the .sup file and it worked like a charm. 😃

Author
Time

So, you guys remember this?

Harmy said:

In the ROTJ Blu-Ray there’s this whole section which is extremely soft. Here’s a comparison of a shot of Han aboard the shuttle and the same angle from a couple of minutes later:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/150516

And this drop in quality persists for several minutes up until the speederbike chase and I’ve seen some HD scans of prints, which clearly show that this drop in quality wasn’t there in the theatrical prints, in fact, even the theatrical prints actually have much better detail in this section than the BD, so it’s definitely a problem specific to this transfer and it may seem too careless even for Lucasfilm but that’s what happened - my guess would be that the scan did actually go a bit out of focus in that section, but because the master was being done for DVD and for DVD the detail was still fine and they were in a big hurry, they probably just threw a sharpening filter at it and it looked ok on DVD. But this transfer should never have been used for an HD release.

Also notice what I call the carpet syndrome - thin vertical lines running through the whole image, making it look like it’s being projected on a carpet - this is actually present throughout the whole transfer but it’s most obvious in this segment, (which only goes to prove they sharpened it more than the rest, which would make this kind of artifact more visible). It can be dealt with using a slight horizontal blur, which is why it’s not visible on the HDTV captures, which are quite a bit softer than the BD but I’d really love to know what caused this, because I’ve actually seen this effects on many studio masters I’ve worked with in my job and it’s a bit of a mystery to me.

Here’s a quick and dirty fix for that carpeted shot:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/150537

Well, hold on to your hats, because I finally got my hands on a scan of reel 3 from an LPP print and here’s a comparison with the Blu-Ray:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/153998

The difference is shocking!

By the way, this problem is present pretty much exactly throughout the second half of reel three and definitely ends precisely with the last shot of reel 3 and since the negative is actually split into smaller ten-minute reels, it definitely points to them just mucking up the scanning of what would be reel 6 of the negative and instead of re-scanning with proper focus, they just threw a sharpening filter at it.

Author
Time

Also, that 35mm scan is very, very clean. Since it’s near the end of a reel, I’m assuming it gets more beat up as it goes on? What’s the overall condition?

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

Shocking, yes!
BTW, for those who like to ‘try this at home’
the 6th 1000ft reel comprise workprint frames 68664-83373

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

I chose a very clean frame on purpose for the comparison - there are sections that are more damaged than others and the ends of reels are really beat up. Also, just to clarify - cleaning up a whole big section like this is a pretty big task, so it’s not likely to be swapped for a print scan in v2.0. In v2.5 though, I’ll definitely at least try.

Author
Time

That’s exactly the shot that jumped out so well to me that I knew even my wife would be able to tell the difference (she has a certain amount of apathy). It is really nice to see a glimpse of what it should be. Here’s hoping you put as much of that as possible into v2.0.

Author
Time

Harmy, in the immortal words of Zefram Cochrane as he gazed upon beauty for the first time:

“SWEET JESUS!!!”

It’s really sad when the “creative minds” behind something we hold dear are also guilty of its destruction.

Author
Time

…wrong franchise.

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time

Danfun128 said:

…wrong franchise.

No shit. It’s from a concept entitled “humor.” 😃

It’s really sad when the “creative minds” behind something we hold dear are also guilty of its destruction.

Author
Time

Hello!

Im new here and so I apologize if this question is an old one, or if for whatever reason you find this offensive:

Is the current Despecialized Edition of Return of the Jedi the [for all intents and purposes] final version? Or are you still working on it? Im very excited to download the trilogy and I plan on burning them individually onto BR disks and creating custom menus and whatnot for them, so Im just curious to know if I should wait off on Jedi for the time being if there is another version being worked on.

Thanks for all of your hard work!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

cfighter said:

Hello!

Im new here and so I apologize if this question is an old one, or if for whatever reason you find this offensive:

Is the current Despecialized Edition of Return of the Jedi the [for all intents and purposes] final version? Or are you still working on it? Im very excited to download the trilogy and I plan on burning them individually onto BR disks and creating custom menus and whatnot for them, so Im just curious to know if I should wait off on Jedi for the time being if there is another version being worked on.

Thanks for all of your hard work!

As you might see from the last few posts, the current circulating version of Jedi is a workprint. It has a (nearly invisible) frame counter for the sake of providing feedback. It also has an extra ‘warning’ type thing during the Fox logo, and a few minor errors. I wouldn’t burn it unless you need to in order to watch. But you can still work on your menus while you wait for the real release.

I think you’ll find that ‘Final’ is a tricky word around here. There’s no telling with certainty how long projects will go on. But if you end up burning the 2.5 (or 2.0) copies, you’ll certainly have a clean, polished trilogy. Just back up your project files for creating your disc menus in case you want to update in the years to come.

Author
Time

cfighter said:

Hello!

Im new here and so I apologize if this question is an old one, or if for whatever reason you find this offensive:

Is the current Despecialized Edition of Return of the Jedi the [for all intents and purposes] final version? Or are you still working on it? Im very excited to download the trilogy and I plan on burning them individually onto BR disks and creating custom menus and whatnot for them, so Im just curious to know if I should wait off on Jedi for the time being if there is another version being worked on.

Thanks for all of your hard work!

A workprint for the upcoming version 2.0 of ROTJ is currently making the rounds. It’s more or less a test and feedback kinda thing. But, the finished v2.0 will be done as soon as Harmy can make it happen within his schedule. If I were you, I’d wait for 2.0 to make a label and burn a BD with.

It’s really sad when the “creative minds” behind something we hold dear are also guilty of its destruction.