"While I feel the Big Bang is an adequate theory, it does not tell everything but what it's tying to explain is pretty fuckin complicatd so why should it."
As I said, the theory assumes space and time were in existence all along, and it assumes that at least some matter was also in existence. To date it has offered no explanation as to the origin of the universe (or the matter contained within), it just tries to explain "how that matter became spread out into galaxies". It's not a great theory.
"for example many forms of lucemia(Sp) are not resistant to Penicillin, this occured because some forms of the disease in the 1940s were resistant to the anti biotic because of a simple mutation."
Wrong. Natural selection. Those resistant were the ones to live on, and so (if anything) you are losing the genetic code that was not as beneficial. Again though, this is only based on natural selection, not evolution. They didn't evolve, they had the genes to resistance to penicillin all along, and those who had them lived on.
"there are many more examples of this look at HIV do you know why we cant cure it or create a vaccience for it, its cus the body virus mutates so much."
True, however a virus is not a living organism.
"look at the cattle industery do you know why we have some cows that produce milk like mad, its because since the 1700sman has been selectively breeding so the cow has evolved to produce more milk."
Natural selection, again using only genes that are originally present. That doesn't prove evolution, or even add supporting evidence.
"If God created the niverse, where the hell did God coem from."
Logically God exists outside the universe, where such rules and scientific laws are not only unknown, but incomprehensible. One thing you have to remember is that outside of the universe there is no time. Time is part of our universe.