logo Sign In

Post #81012

Author
Shimraa
Parent topic
Myths
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/81012/action/topic#81012
Date created
9-Dec-2004, 10:26 AM
This is Shimraa's friend.

Silly boy with his computer on and door unlocked is taking a shower so I thought I'd add my two cents. I'd like to say that I'm more tiilting towards the evolutionist view of creation as it seems to make more logical sense. In addition to this, I find that frequently religious arguments condemning evolutionism have virtualy no merit. One of you guys brought up something about the Big Bang. as this is what everyone can safely agree is the quintisential point of creation it seems relevent. While I feel the Big Bang is an adequate theory, it does not tell everything but what it's tying to explain is pretty fuckin complicatd so why should it. People who use the inability of science to explain where all this matter came from are either searching too hard for an argument or are retarded. Just because there isn't a cohesive explanation doesn't mean it's not possible. I'd also like to point out that creationism presents the same prolem. If God created the niverse, where the hell did God coem from. Kinda poses the same questions if you ask me. Also, evolution does not talk about the origin of life or the universe or anything. The book is called "Origin of Species". It's a good book, suggest you read it. Darwin never once claimed to explain where everything came from just why there's soo much variety. A completely different banch of science came up with the Big Bang theory based on analysis of light from far off in space and the composition of matter. Currently the most valid theory explaining the Big Bang would be string theory, which is disgustingly complicated and frankl too long of a discussion to get into on a posting forum. And just a tip to constructing some kind of valid argument, use actualy valid premises to support you conclusions, not just dumbfuck facts pulled out of your ass. Cheers.

P.S.: As an added point to argue. I must remind everyone that this a Star Wars forum, and so comments must be takn in contrast. I am not very well vesed in the tales of the so caled wars of the stars, but am knowledgable to enough to know that thi war torn galaxy, hasgood,....and evil. Upon analysis of your avatars I have noticed that both Darth Chaltab's and Daniel B's are for the dark side. I mean hell, Daniel's is Darth vader, he's like the biggest asshole out there after the emperor. I mean he's really cool, just fuckin mean. So both of your are likely horrible un truths to misguide the populace of the empire you govern. Dirty nasty propaganda. And to show that Shimraa's argument is very true, may I point out that his avatar is of Nom Anor. Whom I have been led to believe is a double agent of one of the cool fuckin aliens. Not only is he a cool fuckin alien, but he's a double secret agent. I mean James Bond was only secret agent, and he slept with like three girls every movie and had a lot of of really cool stuff. So this guy, must sleep with twice as many girls, have twice as much cool stuff, and have at least twice as many movies. AND he's an alien, a fuckin cool one. Ina ddition to this great reason why Shimraa is correct, is that his name also happens to be the cool fuckin aliens leader or whatever. I mean that's amazing. Not only is his avatar one of an uber cool dude, but his namesake could kick yur ass to wherever the hell far off galaxy he came from. Just a point I think you should consider. TTFN