Anywho. Hitler--anyone--being analy raped is offensive, and I would definietly not want to play a game about that. Not because I like Hitler, but because I don't images of rape, especially homosexual rape, floating in my head.
But besides that, I've noticed a double standard: anytime somebody makes a game about WWII and shooting Nazis, it's perfectly fine, but if you make a Pacific game about shooting Japanimperialists or Muslamic terrorist, then it's called offensive and taboo? I don't understand the difference? If it's not wrong to exploit past events, why is it wrong to let modern people vent their frustrations about 'currnet events'
To prove my point: Do you think anyone from the WWII generation at home would have objected to Medal of Honor if we'd had videogames back then.