"Making up more bullshit to paint me as the bad guy." (No, everything I stated was true. If you didn't understand the relevance, then I'll help you. To say one is bound by signing a contract he does not understand is capitalistic. Australian law states that if you do not understand [or are incapable of understanding] what you are signing, then it is not a legal contract. You seem to be of the opinion that if your signature is on a contract, then it doesn't matter if you can understand it - you are bound by it [as is evident by calling what I said bullshit]. This does not help your case, but it does help mine.)
SO IS MAKING COPIES OF THE LD'S AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC! (No shit!)
When the fuck are you going to address this simple point? (When did I claim it was my right?)
you need to stop accusing everyone else of breaking the law. (As we all know, I didn't accuse you I merely pointed out it is not your right as you claimed it to be.)
If I were to put one of my versions on the internet, and you watched it at regular viewing speed, you wouldn't know if the fixes were there or not. (Capitalism. "If I was to censor the media you wouldn't know because I am the government." Whether or not people know is irrelevant - it's the chance they have to know. If they don't have that chance then it is censorship. For instance, allowing all pro-government media and banning anti-government media is censorship because it limits people's ability to know the truth of the situation. As you would limit one's perception by presenting edited work without noting it's edited. People in 200 years wouldn't know the originals from the 2004 SE's if they couldn't compare to other unaltered work of the time and the originals were denied to them. To spell it out: the argument is null.)
And as to me "hating" the films the way they were originally - fuck you very much. "I move over for no one, I can do whatever I want because I am in control."
I've spent far more money, time and effort on these films than you could ever hope to", which means I have more rights to do what I want."
and intend to work on a "original theatrical" version as well. (Good.)
Not one person has agreed with yours. ONE! (Who are you trying to convince? Me? The silent voices? The undecided? What a capitalistic statement. I'm attacking your argument, but I'm not attacking its popularity, or counting the number you've got hanging out of your butt.)