- Time
- Post link
Hello, I'm new to the community and I'm trying to find out how to access the newest versions of the films. Mind giving a noob some help?
Hello, I'm new to the community and I'm trying to find out how to access the newest versions of the films. Mind giving a noob some help?
Welcome aboard, toaonua. Your best bet is to read the very first post in this thread. Harmy, the person who created the Despecialized Edition, has laid everything out in detail. It's really not a hard process, and it's well worth it. :)
What can you get a Wookiee for (Life Day) Christmas when he already owns a comb?
Hey guys,
I've recently downloaded ANH, thanks Harmy.
I haven't watched the whole film yet, as I'm waiting for the appropriate moment to watch it with my 5 year old son, in anticipation of the new films coming in December, which I'm really looking forward to. So thanks again to Harmy and others for putting these out.
However, I had a couple of points, and I hope these are not taken as flat out negative criticism, I just wanted to point out a couple of things I've noticed and to see if people had any opinions.
Anyway, see what people think? Sorry if I seem overly critical or misguided, I'm an absolute novice when it comes to film editing/cinematography, so I could be talking rubbish.
1. I never really noticed a problem with sharpening. Looking at it side-by-side with other projects, maybe it's bit sharp or maybe it's the contrast, but it looks good. The scene you're talking about has really awful color and contrast on the blu-ray and is tough to get looking good.
2. The color has been discussed a million times since the new versions came out. I don't think I've seen it described as too natural, yet, though. I do think that your opinion is probably biased by the more recent home video releases. In Harmy's, it generally looks quite good but there are some shots/scenes that aren't perfect, as the 35mm scans they were based on were not corrected to the print yet. I like the attempt to get it to match the IB tech, but I realize it's not there yet. I also really, really like the moderate color correction of v1.0, and kind of wish we had a version of 2.5 with that color. :)
3. I've read this a few times and can't tell what you're actually suggesting. A way of making the sources blend together better? With some kind of filter or what? I think if you had seen the sources going into it, you'd be pretty surprised at how well they match. One thing that I think could use a little color tweak to bring the sources closer together is where Luke, Obiwan, and the droids are getting out of the speeder at the cantina. But it looks good enough.
The Blu-ray does have lots of oversharpening artifacts and some nasty color boosting, it's the primary source for this, so that's likely some of what you're seeing. The downscale to 720p mitigates some of this, the color correction a little more.
As to colors, there is no "maybe it would look better if...", there is only "it looked like this or it didn't". Harmy had a very good color reference, and he approximated those colors from the Blu-rays the best he could. Certainly he might have done a better job here or there, but the point is that it's ultimately not a subjective idea of what looks better--it's only a matter of what it actually looked like in 1977. If it was also too natural then, well, mission accomplished.
As for blending HD and SD material, Harmy absolutely used a few tricks, for example he did add some fake grain on SD sources to make them better blend with the HD footage, etc. There's still the matter of varying detail level, and if that bugs you, I'd suggest the DVD downscales, which place an upper limit on detail, making everything blend better. They're not HD, but they still look better than any official release.
CatBus said:
As to colors, there is no "maybe it would look better if...", there is only "it looked like this or it didn't". Harmy had a very good color reference, and he approximated those colors from the Blu-rays the best he could.
You might have missed the drama that called the accuracy of MVerta's reference frames into question. I can't remember which thread it was in at the moment.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
Well, most people complain that the colors are too unnatural, which only goes to show the absurdity of this whole color argument :D
Harmy said:
Well, most people complain that the colors are too unnatural, which only goes to show the absurdity of this whole color argument :D
Well, the film was edited with black and white film, so THAT palette should be considered as well!!!! (/sarcasm)
What’s the internal temperature of a TaunTaun? Luke warm.
AntcuFaalb said:
CatBus said:
As to colors, there is no "maybe it would look better if...", there is only "it looked like this or it didn't". Harmy had a very good color reference, and he approximated those colors from the Blu-rays the best he could.
You might have missed the drama that called the accuracy of MVerta's reference frames into question. I can't remember which thread it was in at the moment.
No I didn't miss it, I just didn't want to get bogged into details for what could be a short answer. Basically references can have problems too, but the solution is to aim for a more objectively accurate reference (i.e. counteract the green bias on the Technicolor print), not to just wing what you think looks good.
But yes, the reference wasn't perfect, and Harmy's attempt to match the Blu-ray colors to that reference wasn't perfect either. The objective, however, had nothing to do with natural or unnatural--it's making it the way it was.
Hey all. Been a while since I was last here.
Does anyone actually know if there is any truth to the rumor that Disney is planning an official OOT release?
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
chyron8472 said:
Does anyone actually know if there is any truth to the rumor that Disney is planning an official OOT release?
Not really, no. http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/More-OUT-Rerelease-Rumors-from-John-Landis/topic/18219/
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
Nobody has any special inside knowledge.
There's been roughly 500 rumors about an upcoming OOT home video release over the course of the last 20 years, and every single one of them didn't pan out. But hey, maybe this time around it's totally different...
You want to go on that ride again, go on ahead, but without me.
I'm not concerned, really. I have the DEED. Was just asking because of the potential impact it would have on the project.
You can go about your business. Move along.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
I have become convinced that, barring access to the ANH 3 color separations, that the original colors have been lost. Technicolor gives us a low fade print, but not fade free and we can't be sure how accurate a given print is. The color film stock prints have all faded in various ways. The original negative has faded and that is what the SE, DVD, and BR were taken from. I'm operating under the assumption that the prints used to make the DE LD set and the GOUT DVDs, being the oldest well cared for prints I know of and with the transfers done so long ago, that those are probably the best examples of the color. I found that TESB didn't need much more than some contrast adjustment. The GOUT ANH barely more than that. So I'm going to use the DE/GOUT as my reference. It helps that they match so many other references that I've been going over, such as the various behind the scenes videos and promotional photos. But this whole area of color correcting is really a matter of taste. Those who like red faces, don't mind the DVD/BR edition. Those who love Technicolor, go for that. I don't agree with all of Harmy's color choices, but his color choices are way better than the DVD/BR colors and his version is much more watchable. Since I don't agree with his choices, I'm doing my own. I'm obsessed with getting the flesh tones right, some red, but not too much. So that colors how I prefer to see these films and how I am going about changing the colors to match. And a meeting I had today at work may allow a bit more red into what I'm doing (outside observations of real people can be very insightful).
Regarding the colour on ANH, do the earlier versions of the despecialized edition have significantly different grading from version 2.5?
Cedric T Sealion said:
Regarding the colour on ANH, do the earlier versions of the despecialized edition have significantly different grading from version 2.5?
IIRC, 1.0 wasn't graded against a reference. Obvious problems were fixed, I think, and some degree of correction was done to make different sources blend.
With 2.x, he attempted to match a Technicolor reference, and in each iteration, he tried to either better match it, or remove jarring transitions. I think the most noticeable grading change in 2.5 over earlier 2.x was the scene where Luke meets Ben, which looked almost monochrome it was so desaturated in earlier versions, and it got a little more color in 2.5.
You can look at the gallery to see some examples, between 1.0 and 2.x at least.
I'm a little confused by something in Harmy's post:
"The ISO image can be burned to a DVD-DL and should work in most Blu-Ray players."
Can it be burned to a Blu Ray? It's an AVCHD, so it seems like that should be able to burn to a Blu Ray. It's a little confusing that he specifies it can be burned to a DVD and that DVD can be played in a blu ray player.
The AVCHD version is meant for DVD, for those who don't have a BD burner - it could of course be burned to BD but that would be a waste of space - if you have a BD burner, you should download the MKV version and either burn it directly to BD, if your player can play MKV or use TS Muxer (freeware) to create a BD ISO from it, which won't lose any quality and can be easily burned on BD and played back on all BD players.
You mean I wasted a BD burning the AVCHD version onto it!? Well damn, I had no idea! So, um... TSMuxer will do the job then? I suppose I'll have to remake my entire set, unless... are you still authoring that Blu-ray version?
Ol’ George has the GOUT, I see.
Someone else was doing that for me but they didn't post anything in a long time, so I don't know if that's still happening.
Perhaps you should get in touch with them.
Ol’ George has the GOUT, I see.
I don't think they respond here anymore, do they?
OK, I didn't want to admit it but I sort of forgot who they were :D
It was Nannersplit, I think, and he's been out of the loop for a while. I'm guessing something came up that sidelined the project entirely.
This may belong in the tech tips section since it's a calibration question, but it relates specifically to the Despecialized Edition, so I figured maybe someone here has experienced the same issue. I've got two TVs that I watch movies on, a Samsung 1080p 50" LED smart tv in the living room and a Samsung 720p 42" plasma in the basement (this is where the bulk of my Star Wars viewing occurs out of courtesy to the family). The DE looks spectacular on the LED display, but on the plasma the seams between the different elements are super obvious and distracting. Does the plasma just produce an intrinsically harsher image, or might there be a fix for this in the screen settings? I'm currently using this guy's settings, and I've made a blu ray from the MKV.