But he's not waiting for Lucas to do so, in case you hadn't noticed. Unlike you, he's doing something constructive about it.
"I don't care what you say."
That is what Lucas would say.
"how do you think the art community would react to you and MebeJedi editing your prints of the painting and then distributing it?"
Let's use the analogy of rhis thread - you are the only one who feels so extreme about this . Even skeg64 isn't being the SW Nazi you are being about this. It's one thing not to like these changes - it's another to attempt to add weight to one's personal feelings by "painting" these attempts as an affront to all SW fans in general (especially when they clearly don't support you in your own thread!)
"Please see sense."
Again, you are the only one in this thread who feels this way. What does that say about your viewpoint? Are all of the rest of us "wrong"?
"Yes, you could Daniel ~ If you bought it that painting is yours man, YOU could even do a #1 and a #2 on it THEN IF you wished sell it as a "GG Allen revisionist" piece on eBay!"
Agreed. There's a difference between "can" and "should". As guilty as I thought OJ Simpson was, I hated the fact that his Heisman trophy was bought and destroyed to make a point. The trophy had nothing to do with the crime, and represented a completely different time in his life.
Nonetheless, it was bought legally, and everyone knew what was going to happen to it. Seems people can do what they want to something they legally own (not that any one of us has the legal right to give away even an unaltered version of these LD's, but curiously Daniel seems to gloss over this obvious point.)