Here is GOUT,GKar,35mm compared to Harmy matched to Gout,Gkar,35mm using PDF matching with 50 rotations.

DrDre compared to PDF

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138462

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138551

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138549

Here is GOUT compared to TeamNegative matched to Gout

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138552

DrDre compared to PDF

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138553

Here a frames of TN matched to Frame 8228 of GOUT compared to DrDre's result:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138556

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/138557

Then Scilab crashed and I forgot to save the rotation matrices, which means I have to recalcule them again. I will try it with just 20 matrices this time, because I want to know if less matrices are good enough and the calculation of 50 matrices takes about 3 hours, compared to about 45 minutes of 20.

But you can already see, that the PDF algorithm does worse than DrDre's algorithm when it comes to colouring frames with a different reference frame. With PDF you are limited to frames of the same shot.