darth_ender said:
don't look at it as a comment on morality, legality, or even today's social acceptability.
...and...
darth_ender said:
Thanks imperialscum... I appreciate you seeing my intended point rather than the morality point.
I made no moral comment on what you said. I pointed out one is with consent, the other isn't.
darth_ender said:
the primary function of sex is reproduction, with the secondary of sharing love. Homosexuality is clearly not in line with the primary function. The same could be said about pedophilia or zoophelia.
The same could be said of hetrosexual sex and if you really want to stretch this stupid analogy, pedophilia can result in reproduction. So that makes it okay?
darth_ender said:
There are those who experience such attraction who even argue that they simply are another sexual orientation and shouldn't be persecuted for such attraction.
Those people are wrong as you know very well because consent cannot be given.
darth_ender said:
Don't read it any differently than I intend. Just read the point.
What you said and what you intended to say may be two different things. Which is why I said...
Ryan McAvoy said:
I'm sure you'll argue that paragraph doesn't say "Being gay is like being a pedophile" but yeah it does. Children and animals can't give consent, adults can. You aren't an idiot, so I know you understand this distinction. So why make a post like that?
Again for the last time, I'm sure you are intelligent enough to know what consent means, so why ignore it to make an offensive post the way you did.