zee944 said:

I've checked it. It is image registration and merging. What do you want to hear? It's a decent idea but reminds me of SuperResolution. The theory is much more exciting than the reality. But to be honest, I've never tried this one - if you achieve something wonderful with it, please post a comparsion. After all, if you find two *really* different copies, it should work.

About PaNup: the theory is almost always better than reality... (^^,) but sometimes - and, I repeat myself, SOMETIMES, it produces really nice results!

Here you are: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Star-Wars-97SE-in-HD-using-super-resolution-more/topic/17781

Judge for yourself; please answer in the related thread, thanks.

Back to SuperResolution: after I read what is written in this page, now I now why the R2D2 is ridden by a lot of jagging - apart obvious "quality" of the source; even if video, that shot is like a still, with similar, if not equal, sequential frames, hence the poor result of SuperResolution; that's why a spatial resize filter works better there; the best would be to use both, dependent on the shots, but it will be a huge task, really time consuming...

DrDre, what do you think?