@ DrDre

There's no evidence without fair comparsions with some refined, but traditional methods. That's what I suggested in my first post: to compare your work to appropriate projects, and not only to a simple resize. I'm not the only who requested it. I, personally, would be curious to see what extra details you achieved via SR! If it's a lot, I will be excited. If it's just a little bit, well... that's what I expect. And I never said it would be your fault. It would be the fault of the accessible SR methods.

I was never talking about myself or my "method". I've only posted a few caps to show that the [illusion of] resolution improvement can be easily there without SR. Once it is accepted, how can you tell where the sharpening/denoising ends, and where the superresolution begins? You're experimenting SR because you think it can churn out more from the GOUT than the usual methods, right? Then wouldn't it be important for you to find out how much the "more" is?

I've tried the summarize what I requested from the very beginning as politely as I can. I hope it's not misunderstood in any way.

PS: I wasn't asking the difference there... I was trying to point out (sarcasictally) that deblurring makes the image sharper.