The result of your "superresolution" method does look better than the original GOUT, but I'm unsure if it comes from the actual superresolution part.

You guys forget (or avoid, I don't know) one important thing to do: to post comparsions between your, Team Blu's or some other denoising+sharpening method that was done with at least some effort. It's very misleading to post comparsions with a simple AviSynth resizing (one line of actual scripting?); it should be a good resizing *AND* a good sharpening to make it fair.

I'm not saying there's no improvement. There is indeed some. I'm saying there is little to gain from the "superresolution" theory and it's more about temporal denoising and sharpening. It'd be important to see where the gains are coming from, and if those are bigger than in the earlier projects.