logo Sign In

4K restoration on Star Wars — Page 71

Author
Time

Darth Id said:

DominicCobb said:

...I have an itching feeling they're talking about the Reliance master

This is the forerunning hypothesis, by a mile.  Especially since the Reliance transfer would presumably have "Han shooting first" just because it would be scanned from physical elements, rather than the electronic house of horrors where Rubberhan resides.

(and, by the way, the colors are very effed in that just in different ways than the blu-ray).

 How so?

 

Mike Verta elaborates on the issues with the Reliance master in his vimeo clips. If you click on the one of R2 and 3P0 on the Death Star or the one with the stormtroopers running down the hallway, he does some interesting screenshot comparisons between the official blu-ray, the Reliance 4k job and his own restoration that uses a 4k scan of a technicolor print. The R2/3PO comparison even throws in the GOUT for good measure.

His conclusion is that while the Reliance work does improve things from the blu-ray somewhat, it's also a step back from some of the things the blu-ray actually got right.

Also, I think you're mistaken about "Greedo shooting first" being a completely digital change. That was done for the '97 "restoration" and would've therefore been filmed out to fresh 35mm negative and conformed with the movie just like the rest of the '97 changes. However, IIRC that change was simply an addition of frames from what was already there. So if we're to assume the reliance 4k job returned the Han/Greedo scene to its original form, they could've easily deleted those extra frames after scanning in the o-neg (which would still be conformed to the '97 version).

Author
Time

It was an addition of frames, but some original frames were also deleted at the same time.

Author
Time

I stand corrected, then.

If the rumor is true, I guess we'll find out whether the deleted original frames really were put into storage or not.

Author
Time

Not necessarily - they could have just got those frames from a different 35mm source.

Author
Time

Harmy said:

Not necessarily - they could have just got those frames from a different 35mm source.

 Or they don't know better and left them out entirely.

Author
Time

Wasn't there a fresh scan of Jurassic Park done just for the 3D conversion? I wonder if that's what's going on here.

Maybe that's how this 4k job of Star Wars could've been done years ago without ever seeing the light of day. They might not have wanted people to see any of it, not even in nice 4k 2D, until the 3D conversion was finished.

Titanic's "dimensionalization" took more than a year. The total runtime of the OT is roughly twice Titanic's. If they'd held to their original schedule, we would only just have seen ANH 3D hit theaters a couple months ago. Maybe they "doubled their efforts" to get the entire OT done by the end of 2015.

Author
Time

I really don't think that there's any reason to believe that the 3D's will ever see the light of day in an official release any time soon. I think they were finished with the prequels already and they just show them at these events just for the hell of it. After the failure of TPM in 3D I doubt that we'll see another concerted effort to release 3D Star Wars. 

The Person in Question

Author
Time

Disney has been stiffing 3D fans stateside for a while. Movies like Frozen only coming out on 3D Blu Ray overseas. Unless Lucasfilm bucks that trend like Marvel?

Strange Magic looked like it was intended for 3D, but it didn't play in anything but 2D, thanks to Disney dumping it.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Disney has been stiffing 3D fans stateside for a while. 

Yes.  All three of them.

(I *hate* 3D)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Which is better, 3D or 4K?  I'd normally say 4K is one better, but the letter designations* throw me off.

Author
Time

K is seven letters greater than D. Therefore, 4K is 17 better than 3D.

Author
Time

This still isn't a 3D debate thread, and it's not an outhouse either...

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

To be fair, this thread is pretty bad.  But I can't get behind the rest of that post.

Author
Time

towne32 said:

K is seven letters greater than D. Therefore, 4K is 17 better than 3D.

 Makes perfect sense to me.  I can't wait for this 17 better format.

Author
Time

If this thread were to be moved to Off Topic, which is a legitimate outhouse, then it would fit right in.

Author
Time

hairy_hen said:

If this thread were to be moved to Off Topic, which is a legitimate outhouse, then it would fit right in.

 Thank you for using "legitimate" and not "literal."

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

hairy_hen said:

If this thread were to be moved to Off Topic, which is a legitimate outhouse, then it would fit right in.

 Thank you for using "legitimate" and not "literal."

 That's literally legitimate. Now in 4K.

Author
Time

Is "legitimate" 17 better than "literal"?

Author
Time

DON'T ANSWER THAT UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO TO JAIL.

Author
Time

Go to jail.

Go directly to jail.

Do not pass Go.

Do not collect $200.

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time

Danfun128 said:

Go to jail.

Go directly to jail.

Do not pass Go.

Do not collect $200.

 Sorry

<span>The statement below is true
The statement above is false</span>