_,,,^..^,,,_ said:
I expected much more quality, according to comparison examples...
I can imagine the results would work much better on something that isn't the GOUT, since this algorithm relies on blending multiple frames together to get added detail, whereas the GOUT has had multiple frames blended together to remove detail...
Perhaps we could test it out on the Technidisc? I notice in the example shot on Wikipedia, the processed image has a lot less rainbowing.