Random Thoughts — Page 338

imperialscum said:

TV's Frink said:

imperialscum said:

darth_ender said:

@imperialscum, I haven't interacted with you for some time, so to read this makes me wonder if you always missed the point so completely, or if this is a lone instance.  I don't mean to be rude, but I think you were trying to reply to something between the lines, but didn't read the lines themselves.

Well the most important rule of forum warfare is to state your point in 2-3 sentences. If you write a big reply as you did, with many side-points, it is very likely that your main point will be either lost, not understood or even ignored.

That is just a friendly tip from a veteran. :)

 Username: imperialscum
Join Date: March 7, 2013
Last Online: February 8, 2015, 4:34 PM
Post Count: 1018

Username: darth_ender
Join Date: April 26, 2011
Last Online: February 8, 2015, 3:23 PM
Post Count: 7161

I would expect a little more intelligence. You may not be aware but OT.com is not the only forum on the internet.

 ot.com off-topic is not like any other forum on the internet.

You know I had a revelation this weekend.

As Christians it is not up to us to make others believe, or talk them into it.  That is where we run into trouble. Christianity is about a personal relationship with god and that can not be forced.  Once someone is saved they will not want to sin any more. I think maybe we have been going about things backwards.  It is true certain sins cloud your mind and spirit and cut you off from God and that is why we are told not to do them, but the point of avoiding sin is to grow closer to God.  Without that relationship many of the teaching of the Bible make no sense.  It is tragic when a single soul is lost so that is what we should focus on. Instead of teaching the law first the way to truly change what is wrong with the world is to witness and focus on saving souls.

The good thing about that is that it isn't even up to us to make people believe, God doesn't even give himself the right to force people to obey him.  All Christians should do is state what we know to be the truth, the rest is between the person we are talking to and God.  We don't need to worry about winning points in debates and we should not get mad at others for not seeing the truth because that is where we were before the grace of God touched us through Jesus his son.

I know I have not been a good witness in the past and I was not keeping faith but that changes now.  I am not getting mad at people or engaging in pointless debates that there is no way to win, instead I will just say what I know to be true and trust in God for the rest.  After all if I truly am I Christian I should believe every word of the Bible is divine and that means trusting in God for everything I need and not hating others for what they says about me or my faith.  After all the Bible does say that God's word will not return void, so I will follow that from now on and will stop complaining and stop fighting with people.

After all it's not my battle to win.

Sorry about the long winded post and sorry for the way I have acted in the past, talking about killing myself and wishing death on others, that was very wrong of me. 

Okay carry on with the random thoughts.

twister111 said:

It's my birthday today!

DuracellEnergizer said:

hairy_hen said:

All right, this forum orgy has to happen now.  It's the only way to get all this burning sexual tension out of our systems!

Again, I must reiterate, unless any of you guys are my type (and I'm 100.99% sure 99% of you aren't), I'm not taking part. 

What about women your type? I get the feeling that in that event I'd be pretty much the only woman. LOL.

Thus the 100.99 and 99%. I would have gone with 100.100% on both counts if I were sure everyone here was male. ;-P 

I don't happen to like tornados, very sorry.

Well clearly some of us are going to have to let go of certain inhibitions, otherwise we'll just be like the line of passengers waiting to "calm down" the hysterical woman in Airplane!

Possessed said:

I don't happen to like tornados, very sorry.

You must have been an eastern witch in a past life. 

Leonardo said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

    Outright atheists and atheist/Luciferians are burning down all flickers of decency in the world from both ends.

    The depraved try to imagine they can build a glorious new order from this act.

    They can only produce inhuman cruelties beyond anything Westerners can comprehend.

    All this debate over faith is really needless.

     Of one thing I am certain:  UNDERNEATH IT ALL, PEOPLE KNOW.

     Everyone above the age of 25 with a few functioning brain cells is well equiped with a Sense for determining right from wrong and likely Truth from cruel falsety.

     Some just don't care. A great many care only enough to construct absurd rationales and then drive themselves to as much as half-believe these lies to escape from their underlying Sense that what they are doing is twisted, stupid and harmful.

    Some atheists are driven by a hatred for their Creator after denial of help. Most atheists and A/Luciferians are driven by a combination of the denial of help, guilt over past misdeeds, and the heinous thrill they derive from being involved with the destruction of the innocent and/or weak. 

    But       UNDERNEATH IT ALL, PEOPLE KNOW.

    

 Yes, UNDERNEATH IT ALL, PEOPLE KNOW THAT YOU'RE A CUM GUZZLING HICK.

      Well, having been raised in the middle of a large metropolitan area, I'm not a hick....but I am willing to learn :)

twister111 said:

entering in from all sides.

 I'm listening

No no, what Frink intended by suggesting the group-orgy was for everyone to have sex with everyone else.  That's the only way to be sure this will work, and that the tension will be properly dispersed in order to prevent future arguments.

I proposed role-playing so that those disinclined to be aroused by other men could pretend to be having sex with women instead.  Naturally this means that some of us will have to pretend to be women for their benefit.

If we do this right, no one will even realize that twister111 wasn't a man pretending to be a woman in the first place.

Exactly.

I volunteer to dress up as Bugs Bunny dressing up as a woman.

I sometimes forget why I often have antisexual sentiments. This current gag* is reminding me why.

*I'll leave it up to personal interpretation how to define "gag" in this case.

So who's gonna be jabba?  They obviously get to hold twister on a chain, since the role of leia in this scenario is obviously reserved for the real woman.

I was gonna say Fink's mom, but . . . well, her voice just isn't that deep.

I guess it'll have to be four guys controlling a very large Jabba puppet, like in the actual film.

Salacious Crumb was one of the puppeteers who control Jabba? Tubular!

Count again.

It does look like the puppeteer below Salacious Crumb is for him, not Jabba.

TV's Frink said:

Count again.

I guess this isn't a good time to bring up my inadequacies regarding arithmetic ... 

If I had the means and opportunity, I'd travel back in time to a point where Dr. Seuss was still alive and in his prime and hire him to make a comic book adaptation of the "five words at a time story game" thread.