STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"ADYWAN - 12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW — Page 1245

Sigh... now he won't learn anything.

i misread i meant Frink

did you guys know there was another darth maul arc written that was set after the son of dathomir and the last episode of series would have lead right into revenge of the sith. they literally had the last 53 episodes all written and 4 of them only needing the animation finished i believe.

jedimasterobiwan said:

did you guys know there was another darth maul arc written that was set after the son of dathomir and the last episode of series would have lead right into revenge of the sith. they literally had the last 53 episodes all written and 4 of them only needing the animation finished i believe.

 That's fascinating.

....

No wait, it's not.  Get out of this thread and take your tv show ramblings with you.  This is a thread about ESB:R and your post has nothing to do with it.  Good day, sir!

JEDITED into oblivion.

jedimasterobiwan said:

did you guys know there was another darth maul arc written that was set after the son of dathomir and the last episode of series would have lead right into revenge of the sith. they literally had the last 53 episodes all written and 4 of them only needing the animation finished i believe.

 Good lord, just go away.

Frink and Possessed it's the holidays and you two are being a scrooges or a Grinches. i understand this about empire revisited but adywan won't have another update on the project until 2015 and there hasn't been besides suggestions are closed anyway. can't people talk about star wars related stuff on here it's really not hurting anyone.

Because there are other threads and sections of the forum specifically for talking about general star wars related stuff.

originaltrilogy.com/forum/forum.cfm/General-Star-Wars-Discussion/forum/2/

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/General-Star-Wars-Random-Thoughts-Thread/topic/12545/

Is it REALLY that complicated? It's easy, I promise.

Ooh whoops.  :)

Watched your clip again today and there is one more thing I noticed again it is not a problem that is created by revisited it is again a carry over from the original.

In this shot the ground in the original is untextured (no grooves or bumps in the snow) and the ground has no movement.

As a quick mock up example of how it could look with texture on the ground I did a still.

I don't know if this is actually doable and it is no biggie but I thought about the ground in a few shots before this one the external shot and the ground here could perhaps be re-used or another shot to add velocity that was never here previously. It's a small continuity error that could potentially make it feel much better but I thought I would point it out. I  think this shot could have just been a painting rather than moving footage which is in all the other shots in the sequence.

Anyway Merry Christmas and Happy New year to all and thanks for sharing your great work. Now go and drink Beer :)

*faceplam*

Ronster said:

there is one more thing I noticed 

No there isn't, you filthy little liar.

ImperialFighter said:

HigHurtenflurst said:

Move along, HH - I was merely making 'observations'.  Don't shoot me.  ;)

No, no, IF, your post was great, I missed about half of the little changes you pointed out!  It went straight to the heart of what makes this edit so worth waiting for -- incredible attention to detail in the pursuit of absolute perfection.  I was merely pointing out Frink's pissy over-reaction to a single 'observation' I made.  About something that was quite glaringly wrong.

HigHurtenflurst said:

ImperialFighter said:

HigHurtenflurst said:

Move along, HH - I was merely making 'observations'.  Don't shoot me.  ;)

No, no, IF, your post was great, I missed about half of the little changes you pointed out!  It went straight to the heart of what makes this edit so worth waiting for -- incredible attention to detail in the pursuit of absolute perfection.  I was merely pointing out Frink's pissy over-reaction to a single 'observation' I made.  About something that was quite glaringly wrong.

 Glad to be of service.

adywan said:

 Thanks for that!  But here are a few observations (not suggestions).  The red font is a little too "red."  And "Merry" is spelled "Merree."  "Merry" is quite glaringly wrong.

Ronster said:

Watched your clip again today and there is one more thing I noticed again it is not a problem that is created by revisited it is again a carry over from the original.

In this shot the ground in the original is untextured (no grooves or bumps in the snow) and the ground has no movement.

As a quick mock up example of how it could look with texture on the ground I did a still.

I don't know if this is actually doable and it is no biggie but I thought about the ground in a few shots before this one the external shot and the ground here could perhaps be re-used or another shot to add velocity that was never here previously. It's a small continuity error that could potentially make it feel much better but I thought I would point it out. I  think this shot could have just been a painting rather than moving footage which is in all the other shots in the sequence.

Anyway Merry Christmas and Happy New year to all and thanks for sharing your great work. Now go and drink Beer :)

 Goddammit we trusted you!

adywan said:

asterisk8 said:

How's this for an idea? I'll donate $100 to adywan if you promise to stop pointing out things that need fixing in TESB. Seriously.

 So, are you going to accept this challenge, Ronster? ;)

 Apparently not.

adywan said:

Could this be more than just a beautiful Photoshopped mock-up?! I want to believe!