DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

This just proves he was a talentless filmmaker from the start

Jackson has not made a good film since Return of the King.

Yep and I liked these movies.

So what if he didn't transcribe the book and give the Dwarves nothing to do but being saved at the last minute by Gandalf? He stuck to the books for three movies and did three movies of his own thing, they are both good for different reasons so I am happy.

Also just because he didn't stick to the books or made some bad movies doesn't mean he has never had any talent as a film maker. At least he didn't just stick people on a couch and use shot reverse shot in every scene that wasn't an action scene. Oh and even if you don't like the 48fps 3D at least he had the guts to try something new to try and fix people's biggest complaint about 3D movies, you have to give him that.

Oh and you can't make a good movie if you have no talent, it doesn't happen. So Jackson's films may not be your cup of tea but I have seen real bad movies and let me tell you the Hobbit films and everything made by Jackson are nowhere near being bad films. Jacks knows how to use a camera so you can see what is going on, he knows how to light a scene, he knows how to put a film together so viewers can follow the plot, and he knows how to direct actors. All of those things take talent and I have seen tons of movies from directors who can't get even one of those things right.

So no these are far from being bad movies, let alone the products of someone who doesn't have any talent.