Ryan McAvoy said:

DrCrowTStarwars said:

What are you talking about.

One example... This is a Bond Gadget...

This is not...

DrCrowTStarwars said:

It had the look and lighting of an art film

Exactly. Mendes should stick to making those kind of movies.

So all gadgets have to look the same and have to be straight out of a star Trek movie and all action films have to look bad and be nothing but one long shaky cam shot. Boy am I glad you are not running the franchise. Look I don't think Bond films will ever be to your taste so why don't you just go and watch the Transformers movies instead, they seem to be more your style.

Oh and you do know that jetpack was only in one movie, so is Thunderball the only good bond film because most of the bond films do not feature gadgets that are so out there.

Oh and you do know that the directors but in the day were trying to make the films look as good as they could on budget too, right?

As I said I don't think you get Bond at all, and it would have to become something it is not to have an appeal for you so I am just as glad you are not running the franchise and we are getting a real follow up to Skyfall. I can't wait for it to come out.

Take a look at the gadgets Bond had in the 60s and tell me the design and function of that radio doesn't fit right in.