logo Sign In

Anyone else blase' about the New trilogy? — Page 6

Author
Time
 (Edited)

"named" Darth Vader. "named" Darth Vader. "named". "named". That word isn't an exact synonym for the word "called". You don't say our current president is "named" President Obama. You could say he's "called" President Obama.

Author
Time

Obi-Wan is referred to as "Ben" throughout the OOT. Is "Ben" a title?

Author
Time

I just started a new thread to focus on evidence in the movies that Lucas makes it up as he goes.... so we can move this "Darth" discussion over there

Author
Time

deepanddark20 said:

The prequels made "Darth" as a title more integral to Star Wars than it had been before.

Even if "Darth" was always a title, I don't see what makes it integral to Star Wars. Titles don't seem integral to me.

Author
Time

You guys spend way too much time thinking about Star Wars.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

You guys spend way too much time thinking about Star Wars.

That's why we're here.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Truth is when you get right down to it, there's nothing in the OT that contradicts the idea that "Darth" is a title rather than a name. At the end of the day, everyone's opinion on the relevance of "Darth" as a title for Sith is going to based on how much they like or dislike the idea.

Personally, I loathe it down to the very marrow in my bones.

Author
Time

darklordoftech said:

TV's Frink said:

You guys spend way too much time thinking about Star Wars.

That's why we're here.

 I have no idea why you think everyone thinks like you do.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

You guys spend way too much time thinking about Star Wars.

 Pot calls kettle black.

Is objectively accurate.

Author
Time

Darth Id said:

TV's Frink said:

You guys spend way too much time thinking about Star Wars.

 Pot calls kettle black.

Is objectively accurate.

 You've messed up another haiku.

Author
Time

fang zei covered it pretty well for me.  I'm probably repeating what i stated earlier when it was announced 2 years ago:

If Lucas was still controlling things, I would want no part of this.  refusal of the blu-ray and the TPM 3D was a positive step in my deprogramming ;)

So thats the one thing the ST has going for it.  I am curious more than anything else;  there simply isnt enough information to get me excited yet.  And I didnt really become curious until that now-famous photo of the table read (is that already the most famous table-read of all time?)

Of Course, the theatrical release of Episode VII will make a ton of money.  As I've said before - no matter whats happened, no matter whats been done or how far it has creatively declined, this is still the most storied catalog in movie history (although after almost 40 years, even Star Wars is now receding).  Whether it becomes a good movie, let alone a memorable classic, is a different question.  And the bigger problem is will we be able to connect to it?

OF course it'll have better dialog, acting, directing, editing, fx, cinematography, action than the PT - just about every movie does.  But thats not good enough.  There needs to be something compelling:  whether its the storyline, the setting, the characters.  And even if this movie is merely decent, it'll become like the GodFather Part III or KOTCS or A Very Brady Christmas or the last 5 seasons of The Simpsons.  A story that wasn't meant to be extended and characters that aren't as interesting because their arcs are simply finished and/or personalities completely changed and everything is too far removed. THe one thing the PT had going for it was the idea of seeing this GFFA we all knew and loved in a different time that we only imagined and the idea of seeing how Anakin Skywalker became Darth Vader.  Whats the hook this time?

I don't like this idea that some of the characters may return but only as cameos. what good is that?  some people will say that 'well, the main focus is on the new characters', but it'll be impossible to not have your attention drawn to the very characters that made this so beloved to all of us. And if we are going to go back to this GFFA and its a different place and these characters are radically different than when we last saw them, then we are selling it short by not having a story explaining what happened to them after all this time.  Its one of the reasons I felt that if there were to be an ST, it should be at least 100 years later.

THere hasnt been much info on Princess Leia, why?  Can Carrie Fisher still even act?  her personality is colorful and outragoeus, but thats not what Princess Leia was.  And if she ends up like that on-screen, it'll be too jarring. Again, some people will rationalize it and say'well, its 30 years later, so she is a different person'. But that goes back to my earlier point - we don't have a story to explain how she changed.   this would hurt the movie and become a dissapointment because we all love this character and it'll be a letdown that can't be undone.

I am concerned about some rumors of the story because it betrays the OT in IMO.  Yet, some fans that hate the PT are still inexplicably excited about it. Ridiculous ideas of Luke going to the DarkSide or that the Empire is still in control after 35 years.  I don't mind Luke having ill-feelings or doubting himself or struggling in a new phase in his life - that could be interesting.  But having Luke go to the Dark Side is stupid.  I also don't like this idea of Luke just  becoming the 'Obi-Wan of the ST'  and 'he comes full circle'.  While its inevitable that he would be training a new jedi, if thats the only thing he does, then its pointless.  THere is no sense to having Luke simply as the new Obi-Wan because luke is not Obi-Wan! and Episode VII should not be a rehash of Star Wars!

I dont mind that if after the empire fell, the galaxy went thru turmoil and alliances were formed after the fallout and were at odds with one another.  That could be interesting.  I dont mind if the storm-troopers were repurposed and went back under republic control or represented another faction. But the idea that the Empire is still going after 35 years would be ridiculous.  Making the deaths of Palpatine AND Vader AND the destruction of another Death Star being nothing more than a minor inconvenience would make ROTJ completely meaningless!! (between hayden creepy stare, NOOOOOOOOOO, leia's memory plot-hole, why can't poor ROTJ be left alone :(  )

Some fans are already rationalizing it by saying 'well, an empire wouldnt fall just because of one or 2 people' and use such horrible analogies to real historical events, it shatters my faith in our public education system.

Its the same thing apologists did for the PT:  they rationalize disgraceful and disgustingly stupid story-telling, plot devices and ideas.  and anything can be rationalized.


So, im not blase - if Lucas was making it, I would be.  But these guys will have to pull off something incredible.  1977-1983 will not be seen again, so no one is expecting that.  But if it turns out that you just can't continue a story after the story has been completed regardless of execution, the ST will be haunted by the legacy of the OT in ways that even the PT was not.

I dunno...has anyone read that Shining sequel - "Dr. Sleep"?  if so, did it work for you?  I guess thats probably the closest comparison I could make.


dang, this was one long ass post ;P

I will say that I look more forward to this than the newly announced toy story 4 (i mean...seriously!?  sheeeesh)

As with everything, the OOT needs to be released in order for me to become more excited.

 

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

I remain completely blase about the new trilogy. The new cartoon series has already confirmed my strongest suspicions, that Star Wars without Lucas is not Star Wars and it shows. In spades.

The title of the new film was announced last week. I felt absolutely nothing when I read it. It means nothing. It's safe and dull and that's what the film will be - no surprises to upset the apple cart because the makers of this movie want so desperately to please the fans of my generation. It's the worst example of the tail wagging the dog.

When I mentioned the new title to my son and wife, I could practically see the tumbleweed rolling across the living room floor.

Maybe this is my cut-off point for the saga. Return Of The Jedi is, for me, the best way to end the series so I think I can happily call closure on something of which I've been a fan since the age of five. That way, from Jabba to Jar Jar, all my memories will be happy ones.

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time

It will be interesting to revisit this thread a year from now. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well, I am an infrequent poster so you'd be better off checking in five years' time ;)

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time
 (Edited)

walking_carpet said:


I am concerned about some rumors of the story because it betrays the OT in IMO.

 I thought that was a well written post as you and I agree with alot of things you said.  I am go back and forth on whether this trilogy will be good, or will it be the PT part 2.

But I have to respectfully disagree with the one statement I highlighted that you said.  As much as all of us here love the OOT, Empire and Jedi betrayed the story of Star Wars in so many ways too.  The reason we went with it was because it ended up being great (in most parts.)

If look at Star Wars 77, most of what you see there is a huge lie when looked at in the context of the 3 movies or 6 movies.  Vader/Luke/Leia are not related, as that is a HUGE change from the original.  What makes the original great, is that each character finds each new character in this HUGE galaxy throughout the movie.  Yet when you watch it as the OOT, it ends up being just one small world of one family.  What a big coincidence!

OK, its one thing to have Vader as Luke's father, but then Luke/Leia are siblings?  Didn't she kiss him in ESB?  Didn't he have a crush on her in SW'77? 

If this were 1982, and the internet existed, many of us here would be saying, "I hope these rumors aren't true that Leia and Luke are siblings, after they smooched in ESB!!!"

So I am essentially saying that none of these movies were needed after Star Wars in 1977.  The deathstar blew up, the good guys won, and yeah Darth Vader and The Emperor were still out there, but the story could have ended, it would be like The Wizard of Oz.  But we went with the changes because we liked the movies, and that is why you have to be open to changes for the ST if they do it right. 

Author
Time

"The reason we went with it is because it ended up being great"

No, the reason you went with it is because you were young and had yet to develop cynicism.

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Easterhay said:

"The reason we went with it is because it ended up being great"

No, the reason you went with it is because you were young and had yet to develop cynicism.

 I agree with that too, as I think it's is a combination of both.  But there is no arguing that Empire Strikes Back is a GREAT movie, and if it wasn't, then there wouldn't be many OOT fans here.  

Easterhay said:

I remain completely blase about the new trilogy. The new cartoon series has already confirmed my strongest suspicions, that Star Wars without Lucas is not Star Wars and it shows. In spades.The title of the new film was announced last week. I felt absolutely nothing when I read it. It means nothing. It's safe and dull and that's what the film will be - no surprises to upset the apple cart because the makers of this movie want so desperately to please the fans of my generation. It's the worst example of the tail wagging the dog.When I mentioned the new title to my son and wife, I could practically see the tumbleweed rolling across the living room floor.

This movie maybe a big turkey, but geez if you are going by the title to determine if it stinks or not then why even bother?  I mean look at the OOT titles:  The Empire Strikes Back?  Wow, that's original!  The Return of the Jedi?  They don't seem any different then 'A Force Awakens'

Author
Time

They'd all be on a site called Isn't The Empire Strikes Back a great movie?

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Easterhay said:

They'd all be on a site called Isn't The Empire Strikes Back a great movie?

 No, most fans like me growing up LOVED Star Wars, LOVED Empire, and liked Jedi (as it is the only one that has its flaws).  So in a sense, we accept Jedi (flaws and all) because we love Star Wars and Empire so much.  If Empire was an OK movie (along with all of the changes to the story), many fans like myself would be a Star Wars 77 fan only.

Just like I am a Jaws 1975 fan and have never cared for the Sequels.  Just like I am a Jurassic Park 1993 fan and have never cared for the Sequels.  Just like I am a Back to the Future 1985 fan and have never cared for the Sequels. 

Author
Time

I do have to take you up on your apparent presumption that you speak for an entire generation of fans. I was five when I saw Star Wars in 1977 (although it's been called A New Hope since 1980 so I think we can get over that now) and I didn't care much for its sequel at the time, believing it to be dull - indeed, it still sticks out like a sore thumb in the series as it has little of what made the first film so great. I have always preferred Jedi to Empire and I think you're kidding yourself if you think Empire is the only film without flaws; all the films are flawed but so what, no film is perfect.

That might not be the popular opinion here but I'm not too bothered about that :)

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time

CO said:


This movie maybe a big turkey, but geez if you are going by the title to determine if it stinks or not then why even bother?  I mean look at the OOT titles:  The Empire Strikes Back?  Wow, that's original!  The Return of the Jedi?  They don't seem any different then 'A Force Awakens'


I'm not looking at the OT titles (they're the same as the OOT titles, you know). I'm looking at the PT titles and how like an episode of Flash Gordon they sounded (well, the first two). And how obviously this new title is trying its best to not sound like them. That's what I meant about the tail wagging the dog. I don't think films made for a fanbase (or, more specifically, a part of that fanbase) are destined to be anything more than embarrassing failures.

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time

Easterhay said:

I do have to take you up on your apparent presumption that you speak for an entire generation of fans. I was five when I saw Star Wars in 1977 (although it's been called A New Hope since 1980 so I think we can get over that now) and I didn't care much for its sequel at the time, believing it to be dull - indeed, it still sticks out like a sore thumb in the series as it has little of what made the first film so great. I have always preferred Jedi to Empire and I think you're kidding yourself if you think Empire is the only film without flaws; all the films are flawed but so what, no film is perfect.

That might not be the popular opinion here but I'm not too bothered about that :)

 Of course I was generalizing, but EVERYONE I know in real life feels this way.  I don't go by who said what on the internet, because god knows how many people have fake accounts, and you really don't know who you are talking to sometimes.  ;)

I was just talking to my friends this weekend about the new movie, and EVERYONE said, "I hope it will be another Empire, but probably not!" 

If you feel ROTJ is better then ESB, that is your opinion and you have a total right to your opinion. 

And please stop with the little backhanded comments 'I think we can get over that now' concerning SW being called A New Hope.  Nobody I know calls it 'A New Hope' as its always been called Star Wars by the majority of the fanbase that grew up with it.  ;)

Author
Time

The kids (elem. Students) these days call it Hope.  All of my fellow geezers call it Wars.

Author
Time

KilroyMcFadden said:

The kids (elem. Students) these days call it Hope.  All of my fellow geezers call it Wars.

 No doubt, the younger generation calls it A New Hope, and the older generation calls it Star Wars.  I was referring to his snarky comment, "We need to get over as its called A New Hope."  I wouldn't call him out for calling it A New Hope, just like I dont need to be called out for calling it Star Wars.

Author
Time

CO said:


And please stop with the little backhanded comments 'I think we can get over that now' concerning SW being called A New Hope.  Nobody I know calls it 'A New Hope' as its always been called Star Wars by the majority of the fanbase that grew up with it.  ;)


It wasn't a backhanded comment. The inisistence on calling something by its old title when it was renamed over thirty years ago seems to me plain stupid. That's not backhanded; it's as direct as you can get.

You're certainly lucky to be in the company of so many fans of your generation; I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of Star Wars fans from back in the day with whom I remain in touch. One of them has said he'll take his boy to see the new film, the others (and they're dads, too) aren't bothered one way or the other.

That's some bad hat, Harry