darth_ender said:

dclarkg said:

darth_ender said:

Let me ask you a couple of questions and we will go from there. Are you religious? If so, what are you?

I don't see how that's relevant for my original question (or the answer itself) but ok. I'm not religious, I was raised on a mild-devoted Catholic home but it never got into me.

Well, many churches consider themselves to have the fullest truth. How would my church's claim differ from others in acceptability?

But I will say, we claim that we have genuine priesthood and prophetic leadership, modern day revelation, and approval from God justifying our position. Of course many dispute this, but that is our claim, and what I believe. We believe that after Christ and his apostles died, there was a Great Apostasy wherein the full truth was lost and needed to be restored. We believe it has been.

I understand that your religion has claims that their own members indeed believe but I'm referring about the arguments to sustain a set of claims as true, I suppose that there must be some arguments that justifies those claims against other theist claims.