StarThoughts said:

captainsolo said:

I'm now pretty much convinced that the CC is the relative closest to the 1982 theatrical look, but that the 1992 DC reflects more of what the shot material looks like.

That makes a lot of sense.

I was thinking the same thing captainsolo. They probably went back to the negative created a new IP, made the changes and made prints. Since Scott wasn't very involved and it was done quickly I always thought it was close to the negative also or should be.

You mentioned the colors on the DC LD. How different does the DC LD look from the DVD?

Chewtobacca said:

PDB said: Sounds best left to a person who knows what they are doing with AVIsynth scripts.

I'm not quite sure what this means.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I meant what you described sounds difficult and time consuming and best not left to a novice like me.