DrCrowTStarwars said:
The NFL was fine with it as long as they didn't have to see it now that they saw it they are upset.
The NFL was fine with it as long as the public didn't see it. Now that the public has seen it, thus increasing public outcry, they fired him. Now, the public should have had a stronger response the first time, but it's a lot easier to get upset about graphic images than it is for just the idea of violence w/ aftermath photos. He should've been fired the first time, but at least they caught up with themselves?
Although, should we fire people for this? I'd like to know if there's a history of abuse here, or if this is the first time. If it's the first time, he seeks help and never does this again, that sounds like behavior we ought to promote (you know, other than the behavior of never doing this).