moviefreakedmind said:
darklordoftech said:
I don't get:
1. How would a Sith be any less of a rehash than an Imperial? How is the ansence of the Sith "taking things in a new direction" if the absence of the Empire isn't? How is Star Wars about Jedi vs. Sith yet not about Rebels vs. Empire?
2. Why can't a Force-user call themselves an Imperial? You can have Imperials without the Empire.
Also, does a force user who is not necessarily evil, but just morally not in line with the Jedi (like if Han Solo in ANH were a force user) have to automatically be a Sith Lord?
Absolutely not. Not everybody who disagrees with the President is a member of Al-Qaeda. One of my biggest criticisms of the EU is that everyone who disagrees with the leading Jedi Master of the time becomes a Sith Lord.