logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 266

Author
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

Tack said:

TheBoost said:

DUCK SOUP

My five year old laughed HYSTERICALLY at Harpo. Good times.

Five Grouchos out of Five.

 I pretty much adore every single Marx Brothers film I've come across. They're geniuses.

 It's a shame it's probably mostly film buffs that watch the Marx Brothers these days, as kids love those movies if they get the chance to see them.

 I was actually probably about 11 when I discovered "A Night at the Opera", and I loved it, then again, I've only grown to appreciate Groucho in recent years

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Lost In Space (1998)

Bad CGI and Mickey Mouse Girl aside, it was a fun movie with some good photography.

2.5/5 stars

Author
Time

Funny how that retractable helmet idea from LIS turned up in Guardians of the Galaxy.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

^Stargate used it first. =P

 oooh beat me ;-)

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

True. I forgot about the SG movie.

Always a little disappointed the aliens didn't actually look like Egyptian gods. Just humanoid guys wearing big mechanical heads.

Futurama did it better. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

      THE GIVER

      SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS GALORE

      Interesting.

      Our tale is set in a dystopian future. Fortunately, we have nothing to fear in our time for a society ruled by a tiny enlightened elite who would reduce the populace to pliant zombies with mind melting chemicals and control over the media. A society claimed to be for human benefit, but where any effort to live the way humans are meant to live is rendered impossible. Our free thinking people would never turn against someone who has become conscious with cries of "Conspiracy Lunatic!"

      What some might mistake as an allegory for contempory whitebread suburban American society is an impossible future where conformity, uniformity, and absence of disruptive passions are valued above all. Think 'drug-addled, homosexual prostitute's conception of The American Dream'. Or, imagine the sort of WASPy, control-freaky lefties who would seize control of the neighborhood association of a whiteflight suburb taking their program to it's logical end.

      Fear not, intrepid moviegoers, for there is a wise elder "Giver" and a youthful protaganist who is called...wait for it...aahhaaaaa "Receiver". ('Cuz freedom's where it's at, myaaaannn. Ya gotta, like, open your doors of perception, myaaaannn.)

     The Giver wears a black blouse with a high collar with a gap in the center and lives like a monk on the edge of the community in a Romanesque rectory full of old manuscripts of forbidden knowledge and with a Mithratic starburst emblazoned in the stone floor in a fashion that NO ONE could EVER call Jesuitical.

    "The Receiver" is a teenaged boy who's assigned function in the community is to take the place of the elder Giver as the rememberer of forbidden knowledge (just in case the ruling junta needs to understand banned practices of the past.)

     The Giver must pass on his memories and understanding. As we all know, there is only one possible way for the Givuit to impart such information; by suddenly YANKING naive, downey-chinned lads "almost" onto his lap and smashing their naked skin hard against his. The Givuit does this, and the young "Receiver" has his mind suitably liberated.

     The Givuit then sends "The Receiver" on a mission to carry a special Receiver baby across a blazing desert, a raging river, and on a snowsled down a frozen mountainside in order to cross the outer borderline, the act of which will cause everyone in the community to remember everything from the past by a method that, I'm sure, made far more sense in the book from which this movie was adapted.

     Our epic closes with "The Receiver" carrying the special baby boy as an offering into a shrine dedicated to The Rebirth of the Su-... I mean... taking the baby to a large mountain cabin that appears to be celebrating Christmas.

    The moral of the story is clear: Go ahead and surrender to totalitarianism. Let the elite destroy everyone in every possible way. Hand your children over to be defiled and turned utterly depraved. Feed them neuron-melting pills like candy and shoot 'em up with every kind of rat poison. No worries. It's all cool. We have our own Givuits, who are perfectly innocent of all these "evils", scattered around all our communities across the country and, indeed, all over the world. These Givuits stand in their temples filled with their secret wisdom ready to be unleashed onto the forces of "evil" oppression. All they need is a steady supply of pretty little boys, and they're good to go.

      You have the Jesuits' word of honor. ;*)

END SPOILERS

     This movie had serious flaws attributable to a great love and faithfulness to the book. But, on the whole, I recommend it.

      

 

    

    

     

     

Author
Time

thejediknighthusezni said:

      THE GIVER

      SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS GALORE

      Interesting.

      Our tale is set in a dystopian future. Fortunately, we have nothing to fear in our time for a society ruled by a tiny enlightened elite who would reduce the populace to pliant zombies with mind melting chemicals and control over the media. A society claimed to be for human benifit, but where any effort to live the way humans are meant to live is rendered impossible. Our free thinking people would never turn against someone who has become conscious with cries of "Conspiracy Lunatic!"

      What some might mistake as an allegory for whitebread suburban American society is an impossible future where conformity, uniformity, and absence of disruptive passions are valued above all. Think drug-addled, homosexual prostitute's conception of The American Dream. Or, imagine the sort of WASPy, control-freaky lefties who would seize control of the neighborhood association of a whiteflight suburb and then take their program to it's logical end.

      Fear not, intrepid moviegoers, for there is a wise elder "Giver" and a youthful protaganist who is called...wait for it...aahhaaaaa "Receiver". 'Cuz freedom's where it's at, myaaaan. Ya gotta, like, open your doors of perception, myaaaan.

     The Giver wears a black blouse with a high collar with a gap in the center and lives like a monk on the edge of the community in a Romanesque rectory full of old manuscripts of forbidden knowledge and with a Mithratic starburst emblazoned in the stone floor in a fashion that NO ONE could EVER call Jesuitical.

    The Receiver is a teenaged boy who has been assigned his function in the community to take the place of the elder Giver as the rememberer of forbidden knowledge (just in case the ruling junta needs to understand banned practices of the past.)

     The Giver must pass on his memories and understanding. Obviously, there is only one possible way for the Givuit to impart such information; by suddenly YANKING naive, downey-chinned boys "almost" onto his lap and smashing their naked skin hard against his. The Givuit does this, and the young Receiver has his mind suitably liberated.

     The Givuit then sends the Receiver on a mission to carry a special Receiver baby across a blazing desert, raging river, and on a snowsled down a frozen mountainside in order to cross the outer borderline, the act of which will cause everyone in the community to remember everything from the past by a method that, I'm sure, made far more sense in the book from which this movie was adapted.

     Our epic closes with the Receiver carrying the special baby boy as an offering into a shrine dedicated to The Rebirth of the Su-... I mean... taking the baby to a large mountain cabin that appears to be celebrating Christmas.

    The moral of the story is clear: Go ahead and surrender to totalitarianism. Let the elite destroy everyone in every possible way. Turn your children over to be defiled and turned utterly depraved. Feed them neuron-melting pills like candy and shoot 'em up with every kind of rat poison. No worries. It's all cool. We have our own Givuits, who are perfectly innocent of all these evils, scattered around all our communities across the country and, indeed, all over the world. These Givuits stand in their temples filled with their secret wisdom ready to be unleashed onto the forces of "evil" oppression. All they need is a supply of pretty little boys, and they're good to go.

      You have the Jesuits' word of honor. ;*)

     This movie had serious flaws attributable to a great love and faithfulness to the book. But, on the whole, I recommend it.

      

 

    

    

     

     

 Did an orderly bring you a bootleg, or do they take you out on fieldtrips like in "The Dream Team?"

Author
Time

Don't make fun of him -- the gay reptilians are clearly out to get his brain.

Author
Time

Deliver us from Evil

I let the missus choose what to watch at the cinema for once!

That's the last time she chooses!

Supernatural thriller with not a lot of either in the two plus hours

Got very boring and dull after an hour

2  supernatural-less thrills out of 5

http://www.facebook.com/DirtyWookie

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Don't make fun of him -- the gay reptilians are clearly out to get his brain.

 I don't think it was a movie review.  It's just how he views the world.

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

DUCK SOUP

My five year old laughed HYSTERICALLY at Harpo. Good times.

Five Grouchos out of Five.

 "He's has a change of heart."

"Yes, but unfortunately his face is still the same."

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”

Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Author
Time

"The Vanishing"

Original French / dutch version. not sure if I enjoyed as much as the American remake but I think it explored the motivations of the killer more. It's a good story none the less.

"Exit through the gift shop"

Enjoyed this Documentary a lot, I would say this is a great educational and feel good documentary about street art and was not exactly what I thought it was going to be also. Nice soundtrack to boot.

Author
Time

BATMAN: ASSAULT ON ARKHAM

I find the recent DC superhero cartoons kinda bleh... but this one was kind of a hoot. Lots of actions, plot twists, characters. A whiz-bang (but gritty and adult content) superhero action movie.

Four Ears Bitten off by Harley Quinn out of Five.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I'm going to take a minute to talk about one of my favorite films and my uncanny habit of finding REALLY good showings of it; Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

First, my personal history with the film. One night, I came across the last half of it on AMC, and was totally mesmerized by it. I eventually caught the whole thing, and fell almost hopelessly in love with it. 

A couple of years ago, I actually went to Devil's Tower itself. And, albeit on a 20 inch CRT monitor, I and fifteen others actually WATCHED the film itself at the foot of the mountain. It was one of my favorite film experiences ever.

Then, last night, I went to a showing at the Alama Drafthouse. Oh. My. God!

OK, first of all, we were shown the Duck Dodgers in the 24th1/2 Century cartoon right before. Awesome. Second, the print was... a print! And it was gorgeous, and epic, and had character. And, third... I ought to explain.

A couple months ago I went to a similar showing of Jaws, and there there was a guy who had brought a large collection of Jaws related memorabilia. It inspired me to do the same here, especially since I actually own a couple Starlog issues with Close Encounters-related stories and the Marvel comic. So, I brought them. This got me way farther than I expected. 

Apparently word got around the ushers, and eventually... I got to look at the print myself! Not to mention, I had a great conversation with the projectionist about the art of real film being in decline and the replacing of it by digital prints.

And, if you're wondering what I think of the film after all this... It's still one of my favorite films. 

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

Tack said:

And, if you're wondering what I think of the film after all these years...

 You're not old enough to say that, yet. :P

Author
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

Tack said:

And, if you're wondering what I think of the film after all these years...

 You're not old enough to say that, yet. :P

 Pardon me... Over-romanticizing. 

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Accidental Double Post

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Make that triple... I've forgotten how this site works!!!!!

 

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Prelude to Axanar (2014)

It's funny how a short, low budget, documentary-styled, short fan-film can turn out to be a far better ST film that any of the officially-made, big budget, feature-length movies released since Star Trek VI.

Suffice it to say, I definately want to see the film this leads into.

9/10

Superman: Doomsday (2007)

As an adaptation of the Death of Superman storyline, I felt this movie fell pretty flat. I also wasn't fond of some of the voice acting and character design. I did, however, like how the movie explored the idea of Superman being replaced by a clone who wasn't tempered by his moral codes and ethics. Had the shoehorned Doomsday stuff been left out, this could have been one of the best Superman stories ever.

7.3/10

Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths (2010) - 7/10

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Prelude to Axanar (2014)

It's funny how a short, low budget, documentary-styled, short fan-film can turn out to be a far better ST film that any of the officially-made, big budget, feature-length movies released since Star Trek VI.

Suffice it to say, I definately want to see the film this leads into.

9/10

 That got me back into Star Trek. No joke.

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

Ghostbusters (1984) - Something strange in your neighborhood? Go out and see Ghostbusters! It's playing in theaters (still? I don't know, I saw it last week, late to post here). What a fantastic movie! It's been awhile since I last saw it and I'm glad to say it's still great, especially on the big screen. Lots of laughs, lots of fun. A classic. A

In the Loop (2009) - Another very funny film. I'm a big fan of Armando Iannucci's show Veep, and I was pleasantly surprised to find that this movie is almost exactly like that. Pleasant in that I get a kick out of how unpleasant the characters are to each other (I've always thought Veep features the best insults, this is no different. Surprised a bit because the film is rather un-film-like. It definitely works unto itself as a 90 minute or so feature, but I couldn't help but feel it was just a long TV episode. And now I learn this is based off a show? The Thick of It? How have I never heard of this before? Guess I have some watching to do. B

Before Sunrise (1995) - Been meaning to watch the Before trilogy for awhile now. A very good film. Probably the best depiction of two strangers meet and fall in love one night in a faraway place? I think so. It's strange how much I immediately love these characters. It must be because of how genuine they feel. There's a lot of great filmmaking going on here. There are some bits and pieces here and there that are awkward and maybe don't work so well, but, generally, very well done. B+

Before Sunset (2004) - I'm kind of torn on this one. Let me first of all state that I (as a friend told me afterwards) watched these films wrong. I guess I should have waited a bit in-between watches. Instead, I saw this almost right after the first. So maybe it didn't have the impact it should have, of seeing these characters so much later (9 years in there time). Thusly I think I felt the film was largely inconsequential. And how do you judge a film like this? All three are talkies (if I can appropriate the term), but this is the only one that is a single conversation, told in real time. On the one hand I am in awe of the acting, writing, and directing at play here. Not only is the conversation not boring, I actually was more consistently engaged with the film than either of the other two. I feel like I'm almost a part of the conversation. When I finished the film I had the same feeling I had when I just had a great hour plus talk with a good friend. The issue is that now, a few days after I've seen the film, I've forgotten much of what we talked about. There's just not much there. The film's is lacking the emotion of the other two, and it's ultimately not as interesting ("two strangers falling in love" and "the perfect couple having marital issues" vs. "lovebirds meet up again"). And yet, it may be the one of thought about most, which should be obvious based on the length of this. Even if it wasn't the best film it was still a highly enjoyable and innovate entry. B+

Before Midnight (2013) - And now I've come to the end. I had actually wanted to watch this last year when it was Oscar nominated, but I hadn't seen its predecessors. I'm glad I waited to watch them all. What can I say about this one other than that it is fantastic. All the elements of the production have been perfected in the eighteen years since the first installment, and they are a wonder to behold. Maybe just a little too much random talking in the first two thirds but hey, that's what these films are all about, right? And it works, that's what's important. The last third is amazing. A great ending to a highly unconventional, but completely exceptional, trilogy. A-

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010) - What took me so long to watch this? Super awesome kickass funny fun from start to finish. Further proof that Edgar Wright is one of the best in the biz right now. Get this man a Star Wars movie! B+

On the Waterfront (1954) - Not my first watch and certainly not my last. What can be said that hasn't been already? An incredible piece of cinema. A+

Author
Time

"Horse Feathers"

Corrupt college football is still topical, and the Marx Bros are always hilarious.

I give it four College Widows out of five.

My five year old gives it eight Funny Guy Who Doesn't Talk out of eight.