That is very odd, and I didn't notice that when I first came across the article. It makes even less sense than the people who are worried that Lucas somehow made it so Disney isn't allowed to release the OUT in the contract when they bought Lucasfilm. I'm skeptical of what he meant by "sources", one of my problems with the comicbook.com site was that they claimed to have accurate sources but then made no explanation as to who they were or what they said or why it should be considered accurate. If the sources saying Fox will refuse to release the OUT because of Lucas think that the OT is owned by Fox, then I definitely don't put any faith into what they have to say, but who knows