logo Sign In

Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD** — Page 141

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TK-949 said:

Laserschwert said:


Edit: Oh, I see, they don't close on top of each other, but front/back-wise.



Edit: You mean, like this:


Almost... I think the lower half of the engine still rotates downwards, and the upper half rotates upwards (IF the engine splits open at all).

Author
Time
 (Edited)

You're right. Silly me.

Edit: This makes more sense

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5587/14728351833_6c5b20b935_o.jpg

I think the engine splits, because each half has its own exhaust port.

Author
Time

The engine splits--or rather, it's actually two semicircular engines--because that's how it worked in Ralph McQuarrie's paintings of X-wings. That detail was changed for the final models into two separate circular engines. It's something that's always stood out for me when I look at the McQuarrie paintings of the Death Star battle.

“That Darth Vader, man. Sure does love eating Jedi.”

Author
Time

ATMachine said:

The engine splits--or rather, it's actually two semicircular engines--because that's how it worked in Ralph McQuarrie's paintings of X-wings.

Well, that's not really a valid argument ;) Of course I know that McQuarrie's design had splitting engines, but since we haven't seen a version of the new prop with open S-foils, we can't be 100% sure.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Really nice job on the teaser.  Love the openness and fan inclusion with Abrams.

No doubt a call-back to the McQuarrie designs, including the colors.  Even a nod to the original film with the tiny Death Star droid.  They've really made a point of getting the 1977 vibe. 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Oh wow, I didn't even notice that "over/under" design of how the s-foils fold up.

Author
Time

Harmy said:

Love the beat-up paint job - used universe indeed :-)

Abused, even, in ways more than one.

I like those teasers, but my stance on Abrams remains the same. That is: highly skeptical at best.

Author
Time

Fang Zei said:

Oh wow, I didn't even notice that "over/under" design of how the s-foils fold up.

Yeah, that's really clever. I can imagine people looking at it in the movie as it goes into combat and thinking: "Ah, a single wing desig....whaaaa?!"

Also, I wonder if small things like the mouse droid are just misdirection on the part of Abrams. I'd like to think that they wouldn't include everything from the previous movies just because it's recognizable as being from Star Wars.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

NeverarGreat said:

I'd like to think that they wouldn't include everything from the previous movies just because it's recognizable as being from Star Wars.

That's modern moviemaking for you, unfortunately. STID had plenty of that.

Though I imagine that this particular model wouldn't be terribly expensive or otherwise demanding to make just for the purpose of this teaser.

Author
Time

Abrams did say "what is that doing here?"

If this entire movie is full of McQuarrie designs I'm going to shit myself.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

If this entire movie is full of McQuarrie designs I'm going to shit myself.

 ....dream come true

J

Author
Time

Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but it's definitely the 1977 recording of the main theme at the end of that video.

The nostalgia button-pushing continues....

Author
Time

That helmet the pilot is wearing looks pretty interesting.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

More teasing from the set:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWBGrkc360M

This time the full-sized new-model 38 ABY X-Wing.

JEDIT: It might be an older model, it's pretty beat up. Maybe a 25 ABY. Good year, they used the *pretends to talk like he knows something about cars/X-Wings*

 YEEEESSSSSSS!!! *Hands waving all over the place and jumping up and down in excitement*

Wow the new pilot uniform looks very cool and now a squadron in the original blue!

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Stupid question, but what's JJ saying just a split-second before it cuts to the music?

Is he saying "that" a second time?

The camera is craned so far out I can barely see his face.

Author
Time

Yup. As if restating the question to someone off-camera.

Author
Time

That's what I thought, just making sure. For some reason it sounded weird to me.

Author
Time
 (Edited)


Tobar said:

And I think Abrams lack of respect for storytelling is most telling in the people he has writing for him. Orci, Kurtzman and Lindelof are some of the worst screenwriters working today. They don't give a damn about telling a good story, they just want to create a framework to film something "exciting." They don't care if it doesn't make sense as long as it'll look great on the screen.

Hijacking Tobar's JJ post from the Trek thread over in off-topic because I feel it's relevant here.  Allow me to direct you to the original theatrical trailer for Star Wars.  Pay close attention to a particular quote from the narrator: "The story of a boy, a girl, and a universe."  Sounds pretty simplistic, right?  There's not much depth to the trailer... and, ultimately, I feel the same way about the film itself.  At its core, Star Wars 77 really is a movie of style over substance.  It's the movie George Lucas made because he couldn't get the rights to Flash Gordon.  It gives you everything you want from a blockbuster film - easy to follow plot, endearing characters played by actors with chemistry, etc. - but goes above and beyond due to (well, I personally attribute much of the success to these factors) the editing and iconic musical themes throughout.  I must admit, in my time here, Anchorhead's love of '77 rubbed off on me.

While I said it gives its audience what it wants, that doesn't necessarily mean it entirely lacks what they need.  Star Wars manages to balance the two well enough that the movie never feels like it's missing something.  The two main protagonists*, Han and Luke, have character arcs.  They develop.  Han has a change of heart, and Luke is suddenly thrust into adulthood and responsibility following the death of Ben Kenobi.  In that sense, it satisfies both needs and wants - you feel like there was a greater purpose to the story than the action, even if that's what your attention focuses on.</span>

I personally believe Empire has the stronger story given that everyone, including Leia, develops in that film.  But Star Wars '77 has more style.  To me, it's a pretty damn good standalone film - I don't know if I could say that about Empire.  By the time I saw Empire I had already grown attached to Luke & Company.  Without that bond, I don't know if I would have cared about the characters as much.  Because I knew where they started, the development felt more organic. Also, I'm not sure if it balances needs vs wants as well as Star Wars itself.

What does this have to do with JJ?  I return to my point on style.  The man certainly has some, even if you don't care for the other aesthetics of his films/media projects that come with his role as an auteur.  I trust him to make a simple, fun movie that satisfies both my needs and wants as a filmgoer.  So far, he's managed to (particularly with Super 8) -- although note that I haven't seen Into Darkness, and that I never had much fondness for the original Trek (I started on TNG.)

To close this mouthful of a post, I'll talk about what happens when substance takes over style: the prequels. Trade disputes? False flag terrorism? On their own, fine - even interesting, particularly the latter - concepts. Just not in the Star Wars universe. It bogs down the moments where style succeeds in the prequels, like the establishing shots of Theed. Ultimately, there needs to be a balance between the two that can't just center around having both as in-your-face as possible. That's what the prequels did, and failed. I think Abrams can manage balancing these two factors, at the very least, better than Lucas... and that's me downplaying my affinity for him as an auteur.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

There's a difference between simple and nonsensical. Star Wars (1977) was actually competently written and a good story. The Star Trek reboots are awash in incredibly illogical, poorly thought out nonsense

When Abrams is working from a decent script he makes it work but the writers he usually surrounds himself with show he doesn't care if a script is actually good or not. That or he's incredibly loyal to his friends and will stick with them even if they couldn't write themselves out of a paper bag.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

On the aspect ratio issue for IMAX stuff in home viewing, I think it depends on how its done.  In Catching Fire and Tron, I have no problem with it.  I think they handled it well.  But for TDKR I thought it was really bad.  It was super jarring, every other scene it seemed like it was switching back and forth and on the Blu-ray it seemed like the regular shots were not as high quality as the IMAX shots, which was jarring in its own way.  So I think its all in the use.

I think the X-wing looks good.  Blew my mind when I finally realized how the wings were going to split.  Its sleeker but still look has a distinct OT look, which can't be a bad thing.  I'm a fan of JJ so I'm looking forward to seeing more.

Author
Time

Abrams was essentially a hired gun on the Trek films. On Star Wars, he was as well, but clearly he has more interest in the material and has taken it upon himself to do rewrites (of a Michael Arndt script with help from Lawrence Kasdan - not too shabby group of writers there, especially in comparison with Trek). On Trek he probably didn't feel it was worth the effort to fix the scripts in the writing room, or maybe he didn't know how (or maybe even he wasn't allowed to). But he certainly fixed them when it came time to actually make the movie. Look at anything else Kurtzman and Orci have written: total shit movies. But the Abrams Trek films are for sure awesome fun times. One thing's certain: Abrams can direct an action film.

By the way, I completely agree with bkev's post.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DominicCobb said: 

clearly he has more interest in the material and has taken it upon himself to do rewrites

 That's what worries me. Don't get me wrong, I think he's an excellent director but the stories he chooses to direct usually leave a lot to be desired.

But he certainly fixed them when it came time to actually make the movie. Look at anything else Kurtzman and Orci have written: total shit movies. But the Abrams Trek films are for sure awesome fun times. One thing's certain: Abrams can direct an action film.

All of the plot holes and utter dreck that were in the scripts survive in those films. Abrams personal flair is all that saves them from collapsing in on themselves.

My concern is that it's been reported that he's rewriting the scripts with Kasdan. If that's true, I fear he might be having Kasdan rewrite it to read like any other Bad Robot production. Emphasis on bad.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Tobar said:

DominicCobb said: 

clearly he has more interest in the material and has taken it upon himself to do rewrites

 That's what worries me. Don't get me wrong, I think he's an excellent director but the stories he chooses to direct usually leave a lot to be desired.

I think the direction's the primary reason I liked Super 8 as much as I did (Well, that and that it didn't take place in the 21st century.); the alien stuff certainly did nothing for me.

Author
Time

Tobar said:

But he certainly fixed them when it came time to actually make the movie. Look at anything else Kurtzman and Orci have written: total shit movies. But the Abrams Trek films are for sure awesome fun times. One thing's certain: Abrams can direct an action film.

All of the plot holes and utter dreck that were in the scripts survive in those films. Abrams personal flair is all that saves them from collapsing in on themselves.

That's my point. Even if the script is bad at least Abrams will make the movie good.

Author
Time

I'd like to see what Abrams can do with a smart script.

Forum Moderator