Well, I don't believe in left and right. I believe in upwards toward True Law, or downwards toward ever greater tyrannical horror.
Imagine a sheer cliff. Upwards is a plateau of pleasant green fields and fruit trees. Downwards is a roiling sea filled with vicious, repacious sharks. There is a left and right along the cliff face. Rightwards might be something like Iran. Fascism might be somewhere towards the middle. Communism to the left.
Wherever we are on the cliff face, the issue is essentially the same. Do we go upwards or downwards. Lateral movement will only take us to a slightly different flavor of horrible tyranny.
(It is true that you can have too much of a good thing and attempt to go higher than the plateau. This is the Libertarian error. It will lead to anarchy and chaos. We would arc over and slide down into the shark infested sea. Ayn Rand is the Immanuella Goldstein of the modern era. Like Marx, she was extremely good at diagnosing and denouncing the problem. It's no wonder the satanists have helped to promote her as the alternative side of the equation next to Fascism.)
But let's turn things 90 degrees to the orientation the satanists have been programming everyone to see. Central to satanist philosophy is that individuals must experience the full measure of evil in order to appreciate the "good". You have to bash your head hard into that brick wall in order to gain "the wisdom" of knowing what it is to not knock your head. They tell us we must have both and the sinister side must be more powerful than the right (it's no accident that the "Progressive" bible, Rules For Radicals, is dedicated to Satan.)
Where "right" is in fact upwards, why not have two powerful wings that carry us up?
Ayn Rand was right. Where's the compromise between food and poison?
The focus of government should be upon sheilding the people from the evils of others and protecting the basic value of Life, Liberty(enslavement to True Law in order to escape enslavement by evil men), and property. This should always be done with the attitude of greatest reluctance and suspicion. It's far too easy to get it wrong.
"Progressives" only know how to dive into things enthusiasticaly, head-first. They are the enlightened ones of vast intellectual and moral superiority. What could go wrong?