STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"ADYWAN - 12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW — Page 1202

Asteroid-Man said:

2 part question - 

1. What is ady currently working on along the process?

2. What is there left to do?

 1. The Dagobah model to replace bad matte paintings in the background of some shots (and one ROTJ shot if I remember correctly).

2. Dagobah model, Han in Carbonite, Wampa, and a couple other tiny things that don't take much time, but require help that Ady is waiting on.

muddyknees2000 said:

Asteroid-Man said:

2 part question - 

1. What is ady currently working on along the process?

2. What is there left to do?

 1. The Dagobah model to replace bad matte paintings in the background of some shots (and one ROTJ shot if I remember correctly).

2. Dagobah model, Han in Carbonite, Wampa, and a couple other tiny things that don't take much time, but require help that Ady is waiting on.

 What is wrong with the Wampa?

Lord Haseo said:

What is wrong with the Wampa?

 He wasn't breast fed.

adywan said:

Not working on anything at the moment apart from getting very drunk

Hope you've had a great birthday!

(liked the recent facebook page shots of your Dagobah miniature's progress, by the way)

When you get there post on the drunk thread on off-topic...if you still can still see that is...

How is the hangover? 

You don't know if he is drunk yet. He has only been boozing since yesterday :-D

timdiggerm said:

Hey, no one had spotted the matte misalign on the Falcon @ Bespin until this week.

Ronster said:

timdiggerm said:

Hey, no one had spotted the matte misalign on the Falcon @ Bespin until this week.

You sir are correct but there really cannot be loads more error finding is over thank god.

Happy Birthday Ady nurse that hangover with sime hair of the lamb

 Highly doubt that. ESB was released in 1980 so the technology is a bit dated and SW fans are among the most obnoxious, overly critical and braggadocious fans out there (myself included). Someone is going to pick out something that is so irrelevant that it will take 3 pages on OT just to end another senseless debate. Do you remember the debate about the Millennium Falcon cockpit? There will be at least 3 more instances of this senseless bickering until ESB:R is released......Then.....ROTJ:R.....Fuck.  

timdiggerm said:

We should probably start a "Spot the Errors: ROTJ!" thread

 Well, there's two big errors:

1 - the first half of the movie

2- the second half of the movie.

I'd like to think after watching the three Danedits that the movie is salvageable.

muddyknees2000 said:

Lord Haseo said:

What is wrong with the Wampa?

 He wasn't breast fed.

 You owe me a coffee. And a new keyboard.

regularjoe said:

timdiggerm said:

We should probably start a "Spot the Errors: ROTJ!" thread

 Well, there's two big errors:

1 - the first half of the movie

2- the second half of the movie.

I'd like to think after watching the three Danedits that the movie is salvageable.

 Scandalous!

regularjoe said:

timdiggerm said:

We should probably start a "Spot the Errors: ROTJ!" thread

 Well, there's two big errors:

1 - the first half of the movie

2- the second half of the movie.

I'd like to think after watching the three Danedits that the movie is salvageable.

This is exactly what I was just talking about! :D

This is exactly why the world hates Star Wars fans. 

Jonnosaid:

This reminds me of that discussion between Lucas and Marquand regarding the rebel briefing room in RotJ - the one in which Lucas declared that the rebels were winning because they had the best equipment (can't remember which thread that was cited in - perhaps this one?)

There's no logical reason why the Empire, with their unlimited reach and resources, would purposely field an inferior fighter as an absolute standard - even taking the argument that the first-line flyers are disposable, how come we never see the big guns?

Worse, the idea that X-Wings are just better ships serves to further undermine the whole ethos of the rebellion. As far as the films present the situation (and that's where I personally draw the line), the X-Wing vs. TIE match is at the very least equal, and the outcome of a dogfight entirely depends on pilot skill and courage... and that's the whole point. Or at least it used to be.

 Ok, this is from my X-wing vs TIE Fighter days many moons ago, but it's a good as explanation as any:

The X-wing is a multi-role craft, it has decent speed, guns and maneuverability and a hyperdrive. It was a secret design for the Empire, but the plans were stolen - at which point the Empire just thought 'fuck it, why bother it's out there now'. Before this, the rebels were using Z-95s as their primary superiority craft.
 

The stock TIE Fighter is short-range and weaker, yes. But it's just as fast as an X-wing and more maneuverable. They can also be mass-produced cheaply and quickly. That's why the Empire fields them. They aren't as over-engineered as the X-wing and that has positives and negatives, but they serve a specific purpose: which is air superiority and defence.

Now, by the time we get to ROTJ, the Empire have the TIE Interceptor, which is pretty much the MiG to the X-wing's F16 and far more dangerous to the X-wings in a 1 on 1 fight. It has the same gun array as the X-wing, is just as cheap and quick to produce as the original TIE, and still just as fast and maneuverable. If you're a hotrod Imperial pilot, this is the one you want to be in.

metalmunki said:

Jonnosaid:

This reminds me of that discussion between Lucas and Marquand regarding the rebel briefing room in RotJ - the one in which Lucas declared that the rebels were winning because they had the best equipment (can't remember which thread that was cited in - perhaps this one?)

There's no logical reason why the Empire, with their unlimited reach and resources, would purposely field an inferior fighter as an absolute standard - even taking the argument that the first-line flyers are disposable, how come we never see the big guns?

Worse, the idea that X-Wings are just better ships serves to further undermine the whole ethos of the rebellion. As far as the films present the situation (and that's where I personally draw the line), the X-Wing vs. TIE match is at the very least equal, and the outcome of a dogfight entirely depends on pilot skill and courage... and that's the whole point. Or at least it used to be.

 Ok, this is from my X-wing vs TIE Fighter days many moons ago, but it's a good as explanation as any:

The X-wing is a multi-role craft, it has decent speed, guns and maneuverability and a hyperdrive. It was a secret design for the Empire, but the plans were stolen - at which point the Empire just thought 'fuck it, why bother it's out there now'. Before this, the rebels were using Z-95s as their primary superiority craft.
 

The stock TIE Fighter is short-range and weaker, yes. But it's just as fast as an X-wing and more maneuverable. They can also be mass-produced cheaply and quickly. That's why the Empire fields them. They aren't as over-engineered as the X-wing and that has positives and negatives, but they serve a specific purpose: which is air superiority and defence.

Now, by the time we get to ROTJ, the Empire have the TIE Interceptor, which is pretty much the MiG to the X-wing's F16 and far more dangerous to the X-wings in a 1 on 1 fight. It has the same gun array as the X-wing, is just as cheap and quick to produce as the original TIE, and still just as fast and maneuverable. If you're a hotrod Imperial pilot, this is the one you want to be in.

 Oh really,....thanks for the facts

J

Now, by the time we get to ROTJ, the Empire have the TIE Interceptor, which is pretty much the MiG to the X-wing's F16 and far more dangerous to the X-wings in a 1 on 1 fight. It has the same gun array as the X-wing, is just as cheap and quick to produce as the original TIE, and still just as fast and maneuverable. If you're a hotrod Imperial pilot, this is the one you want to be in.

I rather fly an A-Wing ;-)

hope there is any chance we get to see some B-Wings crack one or two Star Destroyers - always thought the production stills meant that someday (aka Special Editions) we would ...