- Time
- Post link
Didn't you forget to "return output", AntcuFaalb?
So, how would the command look if I have a video, which is 1280x544 and I want it to be 1280x720?
For example in this script:
reel1=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE 01.avi", audio=false)
reel2=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE 02.avi", audio=false)
reel2_1=reel2.Trim(0, 8696)
reel2_2=reel2.Trim(9019, 25486)
reel2_3=reel2.Trim(25530, 40230)
reel2_ins1=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE\v2.5\Vader green lights 1 new.avi", audio=false)
reel2_ins2=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE\v2.5\Han 1st New_1.avi", audio=false)
reel2_new=reel2_1++reel2_ins1++reel2_2++reel2_ins2++reel2_3
reel3=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE 03.avi", audio=false)
reel3_1=reel3.Trim(0, 20651)
reel3_2=reel3.Trim(20694, 39460)
reel3_3=reel3.Trim(39564, 48434)
reel3_ins1=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE\v2.5\Vader green lights 2 new.avi", audio=false)
reel3_ins2=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE\v2.5\Obi-Wan coat.avi", audio=false)
reel3_new=reel3_1++reel3_ins1++reel3_2++reel3_ins2++reel3_3
reel4=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE 04.avi", audio=false)
reel4_1=reel4.Trim(0, 39136)
credits=AVISource("K:\FINAL ENCODE\v2.5\Credits_1.avi", audio=false)
reel1++reel2_new++reel3_new++reel4_1++credits
assumefps(24000,1001)
Harmy said:
output = reel1++reel2_new++reel3_new++reel4_1++credits
output = output.assumefps(24000,1001)
output.addborders(0, 88, 0, 88, $000000)
See above :-)
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
Thanks!
Harmy...
This work is absolutely amazing!
The Force is strong with this one...
- RiK
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
Didn't you forget to "return output", AntcuFaalb?
dwightmccarthy said:
FrankT said:
Try the 'spleen, if you've been invited.
First off, I am a huge fan of this project. Alas, I have been trying to get behind the velvet rope of The Spleen forum, but to no avail. When I could not get in, I tried teh Paradox and JDownloader. Unfortunately, after 4 attempts, my checksum never matches up. Also, Jdownloader is waaaaay bloated with spamware. I am so excited to watch, but I cannot seem to get in.
If an invite the Spleen is around, I would be extremely grateful. Thank you for the consideration.
The above link I posted is WHERE you NEED to go to request invites. Project threads are NOT. Follow the instructions given in the 1st post.
Hope this clears things up.
pittrek said:
Didn't you forget to "return output", AntcuFaalb?
No. The top-level return is implicit (and, therefore, optional) in Avisynth. Try it!
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
Hi !
Just a few words to say THANK YOU GUY ! I burned it to a DVD-R DL yesterday and watched it, it's the best OOT version I've seen. My GOUT DVD are useless now :)
And now, a mention on the Bits:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/051914_0010
The DigitalBits : I simply can't remember the last time I enjoyed watching Star Wars this much.
This is so f****** true !
There is one thing good about this the OT unaltered versions are not nearly as missing as the missing episodes of Doctor Who well if only time travel was possible than I could record every missing episode on either VHS or Betamix than bury them in the ground come back to the present and make a crap load of money for them :)
What’s worse George Lucas changing the OT or selling the rights to Disney
No to take anything away from Harmy, because he deserves all the praise he's getting, but I wish people would notice and appreciate the fact that this is very much a collaborative effort.
We’d be absolutely shocked if the original, unaltered Star Wars films don’t A) return to theaters
I'd probably spend all my life savings on that. I can already imagine the commercial:
"For an entire generation people have experienced Star Wars the only way it's been possible, through the Special Editions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKEX6QJ-zlQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xezn-0xottw&t=2m7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xezn-0xottw&t=4m55s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27RVJJfny4I
...but if you've only seen it this way, you haven't seen it at all."
Somebody needs to edit that thing together.
Here's hoping Fox and Disney like money a lot.
m_s0 said:
"For an entire generation people have experienced Star Wars the only way it's been possible, through the Special Editions:
...but if you've only seen it this way, you haven't seen it at all."
Somebody needs to edit that thing together.
Funny as hell...would LOVE to see that commercial. Queue the announcer! ;)
Here's a trailer I made for the PARTLY DESPECIALIZED EDITION like four or five years ago. The technical execution is horrible, but the idea is there :-)
http://uloz.to/live/xxc5Wx76/star-wars-trilogy-partly-despecialized-edition-trailer-mpg
jdryyz said:
And now, a mention on the Bits:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/051914_0010
I’m speaking of Harmy’s infamous “despecialized” edition
Fanrestore - Fan Restoration Forum: https://fanrestore.com
Bill Hunt said:
On the other hand, in the extraordinarily unlikely event that Disney doesn’t release the original versions on disc, don’t sweat it. You still have options. Let me just be the latest person to say: Thank you, Harmy! Your work is absolutely incredible.
One thing’s for sure… this old roller coaster’s on the move again. Time to buckle up.
Pretty awesome.
Feallan said:
jdryyz said:
And now, a mention on the Bits:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/051914_0010
I’m speaking of Harmy’s infamous “despecialized” edition
Hmmm... "infamous" seems like poor word choice on his part.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
Harmy said:
Here's a trailer I made for the PARTLY DESPECIALIZED EDITION like four or five years ago. The technical execution is horrible, but the idea is there :-)
http://uloz.to/live/xxc5Wx76/star-wars-trilogy-partly-despecialized-edition-trailer-mpg
Right on. Like you said Harmy...it certainly is a bit rough, but a really fun effort nonetheless! Thank you for that! :D
AntcuFaalb said:
Feallan said:
jdryyz said:
And now, a mention on the Bits:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/051914_0010
I’m speaking of Harmy’s infamous “despecialized” edition
Hmmm... "infamous" seems like poor word choice on his part.
I think you're reading way too far into a lighthearted throwaway comment, considering how effusive the entire rest of the article was.
Harmy said:
Here's a trailer I made for the PARTLY DESPECIALIZED EDITION like four or five years ago. The technical execution is horrible, but the idea is there :-)
http://uloz.to/live/xxc5Wx76/star-wars-trilogy-partly-despecialized-edition-trailer-mpg
I suspected this was such an obvious idea someone must've at least thought about doing it ;) Great job, especially with the audio.
Stinky-Dinkins said:
AntcuFaalb said:
Feallan said:
jdryyz said:
And now, a mention on the Bits:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/051914_0010
I’m speaking of Harmy’s infamous “despecialized” edition
Hmmm... "infamous" seems like poor word choice on his part.
I think you're reading way too far into a lighthearted throwaway comment, considering how effusive the entire rest of the article was.
It doesn't (and didn't) actually bother me. I was just pointing it out.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
AntcuFaalb said:
Stinky-Dinkins said:
AntcuFaalb said:
Feallan said:
jdryyz said:
And now, a mention on the Bits:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/051914_0010
I’m speaking of Harmy’s infamous “despecialized” edition
Hmmm... "infamous" seems like poor word choice on his part.
I think you're reading way too far into a lighthearted throwaway comment, considering how effusive the entire rest of the article was.
It doesn't (and didn't) actually bother me. I was just pointing it out.
Listen, I'm not paying you to point things out!
Made this post when I didn't see my last post display...but after making this post NOW this page successfully refreshed in my browser. Not quite certain if it was the forum software or my browser playing the prank, but in any event, POST RETRACTED!
Damn, a mention on The Digital Bits is pretty sweet. I'd sell Stinky's ball (the non-working one) for that.
Two posts, one ball. NSFW.