RicOlie_2 said:

Another question:

Why do you not take Jesus' request to "Do this in remembrance of me" literally? You have the bread and wine which are blessed, but without transubstantiation. Why is this? Jesus said that it was necessary to eat his flesh to inherit eternal life in the Bread of Life Discourse (John 22-71). What interpretation do Mormons give to that passage, as well as the Last Supper passages and 1 Corinthians 23-32.

We do take it in remembrance of him. I don't need his literal flesh and blood to be reminded of him. And though I don't want to sound argumentative, it sounds quite clearly to me like a metaphor. Christ also says he is the bread of life in the same discourse (in John 6, it's nice to see you make omissions now and then ;) ). So does the bread become Christ, or is he already made of bread? See what I mean? Christ is also love. We are the light of the world, as is he. It's all metaphoric imagery. Hope that doesn't come off as a rude answer.