logo Sign In

Post #700846

Author
brash_stryker
Parent topic
STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"ADYWAN - 12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/700846/action/topic#700846
Date created
17-Apr-2014, 3:35 PM

kk650 said:

brash_stryker said:

kk650 said:

GL agrees with me, hence the cropping, we agree to disagree, there's not much left to be said.

So would JarJar Binks. What's your point? The fact you're using such logic on THIS FORUM of all places carries no weight at all. This forum only exists because of George's misguided choices.

What you've said here has exactly proven my point. Essentially what you're saying is because GL agrees, you disagree, without weighing the merit of the change he's made. I know for a fact that there are others on this forum that are able to see beyong this viewpoint but I suspect that many will not be able to be found here in this thread, where every change is treated is sceptisism at best and disdain at worst.

Just because this forum was formed in response to GL and his SE changes doesn't mean that we can't move beyond seeing things so black and white, whatever changes GL does is wrong, how it originally was is right etc. etc.  I want to believe that people here are openminded enough to move beyond that frame of mind and give him credit for some of the changes which are improvements IMHO.

Now THAT is a strawman argument if I ever saw one. You have  taken my stance on his many misguided choices and made out I think everything he does is automatically wrong.  Just because I stated I disagree with SOME misguided choices. I think I made that perfectly clear, but you chose to bastardise what I said to support your own points. Classic straw man. Maybe you need to look up what a Straw man is, as despite accusing Ady earlier it's you doing it.

I liked a lot of SE changes. Why then, would I like Revisited if I didn't? My point was that for you to consider your argument won because GL "agrees" with you doesn't mean anything. Your point should stand on its own merit without bringing GL into it - which also makes you a hypocrite as you JUST said something similar to me!

And now you're not addressing people's previous points on why you're wrong and are just using the above manipulative tactics as a distraction. Poor form.