drngr said:

zeropc said:

a little update on the so called dcp release

it's all a lie. this is a release from 2011 and seams not been shared outside a certain forum until now. i compared the nfo files and they are exactly the same.

Doesn't the NFO state DCP? http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Back-to-the-Future-without-DNR-EE-Help-Wanted/post/683575/#TopicPost683575

How do you explain the images on AVS from the "DCP" source that are in 2K 1.85 resolution (1996x1080) rather than HD (1920x1040)?

the nfo is bullshit. the original source for this so called dcp sourced bd was created/released in april 2011. at the time, back to the future wasn't shown in theaters, at least not from a dcp file. also, dcp hasn't been cracked. it's very doubtful that universal would release any movie, new or old, these days unencrypted as dcp in theaters.

the actual source might be a studio master tape that was used for the broadcast or even for the creation of the original universal studios blu-ray, prior to be destroyed by adding of heavy dnr. this is a much more believable story, then the dcp source for this movie.

i can't explain anything without a link. i've searched for said information on avs, but i couldn't find it. other then that, blowing up a picture from 1920x... to 1996x... is rather easy.

besides, why would ONLY this movie sourced from a dcp? why not others, including older movies that are shown in theaters digitally? the answer: dcp hasn't been cracked, nor was any movie released unprotected.