Bingowings said:

You are making my case for me you do realise this?

I'm NOT making any case for anyone. I present my opinion in a way I see good. The most explicit one. That's it. How you interpret it is solely your problem.

attempts to close down the debate

There're NO such attempts.

Using the reasoning you deploy you must recognise that not everyone sees ROTJ or its director the same way you do so it makes sense that not everyone is going to see the merit in signing the petition.

I have nothing against^ but do you realize that the body of your comments like that^ adds nothing substantial? Do you realize that posting such comments you're distracting the discussion, while unwittingly suggesting that the fashion in which you express your disagreement leads to suppression of an opinion you disagree with?

For my part all I have to say is that I tried to reply with arguments that rely on verified sources and facts, not on hearsay. I made it clear from the very beginning that I recognize very well what "not everyone" feels. I think I made the main message of me reasoning abundantly clear: stiffed cliches and "it's well known/considered by the majority" has nothing in common with reality that's always is much more complicated. I also made it clear that I'm not trying to "close down the debate". He, who has ears to hear, let him hear.

Have a nice day and debate! )))